Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23288399›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2013

Preen gland removal increases plumage bacterial load but not that of feather-degrading bacteria.

Gábor Arpád Czirják, Péter László Pap, Csongor István Vágási, Mathieu Giraudeau, Cosmin Mureşan, Pascal Mirleau, Philipp Heeb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biosafe Management ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring theCurrent zoology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolutionary Biology Needs Wild Microbiomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  13. Toxic metals and associated sporulated bacteria on Andean hummingbird feathers.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

Gábor Arpád CzirjákLaboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Ecole Nationale de Formation Agronomique-Université Paul Sabatier, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, France. czirjak@izw-berlin.de
Péter László Pap
Csongor István Vágási
Mathieu Giraudeau
Cosmin Mureşan
Pascal Mirleau
Philipp Heeb
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRBabeș-Bolyai University · ROCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preen gland is a holocrine sebaceous gland of the avian integument which produces an oily secretion that is spread on the plumage during preening. It has been suggested that birds may defend themselves against feather-degrading bacteria (FDB) and other potential pathogens using preen gland secretions. However, besides some in vitro studies, the in vivo bacterial inhibitory effects of the preen oil on the abundance of feather-associated bacterial species has not yet been studied in passerines. Here we tested the effect of gland removal on the abundance of FDB and other-cultivable bacterial loads (OCB) of male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Our results did not support earlier results on in vitro antibacterial activity of preen oil against FDB since the absence of the preen gland did not significantly affect their loads related to the control birds. In contrast, we found that preen gland removal led to higher loads of OCB. This result suggests that the antimicrobial spectrum of the preen oil is broader than previously thought and that, by reducing the overall feather bacterial loads, the preen gland could help birds to protect themselves against a variety of potentially harmful bacteria.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial LoadBiodiversityFeathersGroomingMaleSebaceous GlandsSebumSparrows

Identifiers

PMID23288399
OpenAlexW2035809595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.