Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23287818›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2013

Formation of composite polyacrylamide and silicone substrates for independent control of stiffness and strain.

Chelsey S Simmons, Alexandre J S Ribeiro, Beth L Pruitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Engineering in vitro vascular microsystems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lung Microvascular Niche, Repair, and Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsey S SimmonsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, 496 Lomita Mall, Durand Building Room 223, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alexandre J S Ribeiro
Beth L Pruitt
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USStanford University · US

Funding

Force Clamp Systems for Evaluation of MechanotransductionR01EB006745 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B, PRUITT, BETH L · 2007 to 2014
$3.1M
Nanostructuring and Molecular Imaging of Engineered Cardiovascular TissuesR33HL089027 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JOSEPH C. · 2009 to 2011
$2.3M
Nanostructuring and Molecular Imaging of Engineered Cardiovascular TissuesR21HL089027 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JOSEPH C. · 2007 to 2008
$777k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL089027NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL089027NIBIB NIH HHS EB006745NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells that line major tissues in the body such as blood vessels, lungs and gastrointestinal tract experience deformation from mechanical strain with our heartbeat, breathing, and other daily activities. Tissues also remodel in both development and disease, changing their mechanical properties. Taken together, cells can experience vastly different mechanical cues resulting from the combination of these interdependent stimuli. To date, most studies of cellular mechanotransduction have been limited to assays in which variations in substrate stiffness and strain were not combined. Here, we address this technological gap by implementing a method that can simultaneously tune both substrate stiffness and mechanical strain. Substrate stiffness is controlled with different monomer and crosslinker ratios during polyacrylamide gel polymerization, and strain is transferred from the underlying silicone platform when stretched. We demonstrate this platform with polyacrylamide gels with elastic moduli at 6 kPa and 20 kPa in combination with two different silicone formulations. The gels remain attached with up to 50% applied strains. To validate strain transfer through the gels into cells, we employ particle-tracking methods and observe strain transmission via cell morphological changes.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsCell AdhesionCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedEndothelial CellsHumansMuscle, Smooth, VascularPolyacrylamidesSiliconesAcrylic ResinsPolyacrylamidesSilicones

Identifiers

PMID23287818
PMCPMC3605189
OpenAlexW2159368268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.