Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23286743›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2013

Observational research with adolescents: a framework for the management of the parental permission.

Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Cristina Lopez-del Burgo, Silvia Carlos, Maria Calatrava, Carlos Beltramo, Alfonso Osorio, Jokin de Irala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Parental Competence and Pornography Use among Hispanic Adolescents.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Obtaining Consent for Research on Risky Behaviours Among Adolescents in Canada: A Scoping Review.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Adolescents' Alcohol Use: Does the Type of Leisure Activity Matter? A Cross-National Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miguel Ruiz-CanelaInstitute for Culture and Society, Department of Biomedical Humanities, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. mcanela@unav.es
Cristina Lopez-del Burgo
Silvia Carlos
Maria Calatrava
Carlos Beltramo
Alfonso Osorio
Jokin de Irala

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWaiving parent permission can be an option in some epidemiological and social research with adolescents. However, exemptions have not been uniformly considered or applied. Our aim is to critically assess the different factors that could be taken into account when making decisions about waiving active parental permission in observational research with adolescents. DISCUSSION: In some cases alternatives to parental permission could be applied to protect the rights of both adolescents and parents and also to assure the benefits to adolescents as a group that can come from appropriately conducted studies. However, the criteria of ensuring minimal risk can be difficult to define and apply and a distinction between harm and discomfort is reviewed. Waiving active parental permission could be acceptable when the risk of harm is minimal; when the research questions are related to an activity for which adolescents are not legally considered to be children; when the risk of harm or discomfort may increase if parental permission is required; and when risk of discomfort is low because the questionnaire is not potentially offensive for some adolescents and/or for some parents. SUMMARY: Stringent rules concerning parental permission in some studies could be detrimental to adolescents. A framework and a decision tree guide are proposed to help researchers and Research Ethics Committees in their decisions on whether active parental permission must be obtained.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityDecision TreesParental ConsentPersonal AutonomyAdolescentAdultCognitionDecision MakingEthics, ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinorsParent-Child RelationsResearch Personnel

Identifiers

PMID23286743
PMCPMC3585740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.