ArticleMolecular ecology2013
Mixing of vineyard and oak-tree ecotypes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in North American vineyards.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- From Oak to Wine: Evolution, Admixture, and Adaptation of California and British Columbia Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Wine Strains.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Distribution of yeast species and their resistance to copper and sulfite across arboreal and viticulture habitats.FEMS yeast research · 2026Article
- Evidence for Historic and Ongoing Human-Mediated Dispersal of Yeast.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Footprints of Human Migration in the Population Structure of Wild Baker's Yeast.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Colonization of vineyards by non-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Horizontal Transfer and Recombination Fuel Ty4 Retrotransposon Evolution in Saccharomyces.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Diversity, Distribution, and Phenotypic Characterization of Cultivable Wild Yeasts Isolated from Natural Forest.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Article
- The distribution of beneficial mutational effects between two sister yeast species poorly explains natural outcomes of vineyard adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Recombination, admixture and genome instability shape the genomic landscape of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from spontaneous grape ferments.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Whole genome sequencing of Canadian Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from spontaneous wine fermentations reveals a new Pacific West Coast Wine clade.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Extensive sampling ofGenome research · 2022Article
- Evolution of natural lifespan variation and molecular strategies of extended lifespan in yeast.eLife · 2021Article
- Scent of a killer: How could killer yeast boost its dispersal?Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Genomic Evidence of an Ancient East Asian Divergence Event in Wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Grapevine Microbiota Reflect Diversity among Compartments and Complex Interactions within and among Root and Shoot Systems.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Sources and Assembly of Microbial Communities in Vineyards as a Functional Component of Winegrowing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- A natural variant of the essential host geneeLife · 2020Article
- Mitochondrial-nuclear coadaptation revealed through mtDNA replacements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Humans have had a significant impact on the distribution and abundance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through its widespread use in beer, bread and wine production. Yet, similar to other Saccharomyces species, S. cerevisiae has also been isolated from habitats unrelated to fermentations. Strains of S. cerevisiae isolated from grapes, wine must and vineyards worldwide are genetically differentiated from strains isolated from oak-tree bark, exudate and associated soil in North America. However, the causes and consequences of this differentiation have not yet been resolved. Historical differentiation of these two groups may have been influenced by geographic, ecological or human-associated barriers to gene flow. Here, we make use of the relatively recent establishment of vineyards across North America to identify and characterize any active barriers to gene flow between these two groups. We examined S. cerevisiae strains isolated from grapes and oak trees within three North American vineyards and compared them to those isolated from oak trees outside of vineyards. Within vineyards, we found evidence of migration between grapes and oak trees and potential gene flow between the divergent oak-tree and vineyard groups. Yet, we found no vineyard genotypes on oak trees outside of vineyards. In contrast, Saccharomyces paradoxus isolated from the same sources showed population structure characterized by isolation by distance. The apparent absence of ecological or genetic barriers between sympatric vineyard and oak-tree populations of S. cerevisiae implies that vineyards play an important role in the mixing between these two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.