Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23285220›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Early clinical and subclinical visual evoked potential and Humphrey's visual field defects in cryptococcal meningitis.

Anand Moodley, William Rae, Ahmed Bhigjee, Cathy Connolly, Natasha Devparsad, Andrew Michowicz, Thomas Harrison, Angela Loyse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurological Sequelae After Paediatric Cryptococcal Meningitis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pattern- and motion-related visual evoked potentials in HIV-infected adults.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Anand MoodleyDepartment of Neurology, Greys Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. anand.moodley@kznhealth.gov.za
William Rae
Ahmed Bhigjee
Cathy Connolly
Natasha Devparsad
Andrew Michowicz
Thomas Harrison
Angela Loyse
Grey's Hospital · ZASt George's, University of London · GBEdendale Hospital · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of the Free State · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council RN 2721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptococcal induced visual loss is a devastating complication in survivors of cryptococcal meningitis (CM). Early detection is paramount in prevention and treatment. Subclinical optic nerve dysfunction in CM has not hitherto been investigated by electrophysiological means. We undertook a prospective study on 90 HIV sero-positive patients with culture confirmed CM. Seventy-four patients underwent visual evoked potential (VEP) testing and 47 patients underwent Humphrey's visual field (HVF) testing. Decreased best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected in 46.5% of patients. VEP was abnormal in 51/74 (68.9%) right eyes and 50/74 (67.6%) left eyes. VEP P100 latency was the main abnormality with mean latency values of 118.9 (±16.5) ms and 119.8 (±15.7) ms for the right and left eyes respectively, mildly prolonged when compared to our laboratory references of 104 (±10) ms (p<0.001). Subclinical VEP abnormality was detected in 56.5% of normal eyes and constituted mostly latency abnormality. VEP amplitude was also significantly reduced in this cohort but minimally so in the visually unimpaired. HVF was abnormal in 36/47 (76.6%) right eyes and 32/45 (71.1%) left eyes. The predominant field defect was peripheral constriction with an enlarged blind spot suggesting the greater impact by raised intracranial pressure over that of optic neuritis. Whether this was due to papilloedema or a compartment syndrome is open to further investigation. Subclinical HVF abnormalities were minimal and therefore a poor screening test for early optic nerve dysfunction. However, early optic nerve dysfunction can be detected by testing of VEP P100 latency, which may precede the onset of visual loss in CM.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsymptomatic DiseasesCohort StudiesEarly DiagnosisEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleMeningitis, CryptococcalMiddle AgedVision DisordersVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23285220
PMCPMC3528708
OpenAlexW2125292753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.