Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23285167›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Identification of novel cholesteatoma-related gene expression signatures using full-genome microarrays.

Christin Klenke, Sebastian Janowski, Daniela Borck, Darius Widera, Jörg Ebmeyer, Jörn Kalinowski, Anke Leichtle, Ralf Hofestädt, Tahwinder Upile, Christian Kaltschmidt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review of potential medical treatments for middle ear cholesteatoma.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Non-coding RNA and cholesteatoma.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022
    Review
  7. Immunomodulation as a Protective Strategy in Chronic Otitis Media.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Updates and knowledge gaps in cholesteatoma research.BioMed research international · 2015
    Review
  20. NOD-Like Receptor Signaling in Cholesteatoma.BioMed research international · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christin KlenkeDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany. christin.zander@klinikumbielefeld.de
Sebastian Janowski
Daniela Borck
Darius Widera
Jörg Ebmeyer
Jörn Kalinowski
Anke Leichtle
Ralf Hofestädt
Tahwinder Upile
Christian Kaltschmidt
Barbara Kaltschmidt
Holger Sudhoff
Bielefeld University · DEKlinikum Bielefeld · DEUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholesteatoma is a gradually expanding destructive epithelial lesion within the middle ear. It can cause extensive local tissue destruction in the temporal bone and can initially lead to the development of conductive hearing loss via ossicular erosion. As the disease progresses, sensorineural hearing loss, vertigo or facial palsy may occur. Cholesteatoma may promote the spread of infection through the tegmen of the middle ear and cause meningitis or intracranial infections with abscess formation. It must, therefore, be considered as a potentially life-threatening middle ear disease. METHODS AND

findingsIn this study, we investigated differentially expressed genes in human cholesteatomas in comparison to regular auditory canal skin using Whole Human Genome Microarrays containing 19,596 human genes. In addition to already described up-regulated mRNAs in cholesteatoma, such as MMP9, DEFB2 and KRT19, we identified 3558 new cholesteatoma-related transcripts. 811 genes appear to be significantly differentially up-regulated in cholesteatoma. 334 genes were down-regulated more than 2-fold. Significantly regulated genes with protein metabolism activity include matrix metalloproteinases as well as PI3, SERPINB3 and SERPINB4. Genes like SPP1, KRT6B, PRPH, SPRR1B and LAMC2 are known as genes with cell growth and/or maintenance activity. Transport activity genes and signal transduction genes are LCN2, GJB2 and CEACAM6. Three cell communication genes were identified; one CDH19 and two from the S100 family.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the expression profile of cholesteatoma is similar to a metastatic tumour and chronically inflamed tissue. Based on the investigated profiles we present novel protein-protein interaction and signal transduction networks, which include cholesteatoma-regulated transcripts and may be of great value for drug targeting and therapy development.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCholesteatoma, Middle EarCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyConnexin 26ConnexinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenomicsHumansKeratinsProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsReproducibility of ResultsSignal TransductionConnexin 26ConnexinsGJB2 protein, humanKeratins

Identifiers

PMID23285167
PMCPMC3527606
OpenAlexW2041942054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.