Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23285074›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Comparative analysis of methods for identifying recurrent copy number alterations in cancer.

Xiguo Yuan, Junying Zhang, Shengli Zhang, Guoqiang Yu, Yue Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiguo YuanSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, PR China.
Junying Zhang
Shengli Zhang
Guoqiang Yu
Yue Wang
Xidian University · CNVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Proteome Characterization Center: A Genoproteomics Pipeline for Cance ResearchU24CA160036 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, DANIEL WANYUI, ZHANG, HUI · 2011 to 2016
$10.7M
Novel Targets in Endocrine ResponsivenessU54CA149147 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CLARKE, ROBERT R. · 2010 to 2014
$6.9M
Machine learning to identify predictive SNPs and complex interaction effectsR21GM085665 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI WANG, YUE · 2009 to 2010
$434k
NCI NIH HHS CA149147NCI NIH HHS CA160036NCI NIH HHS U24 CA160036NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149147NIGMS NIH HHS GM085665NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM085665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent copy number alterations (CNAs) play an important role in cancer genesis. While a number of computational methods have been proposed for identifying such CNAs, their relative merits remain largely unknown in practice since very few efforts have been focused on comparative analysis of the methods. To facilitate studies of recurrent CNA identification in cancer genome, it is imperative to conduct a comprehensive comparison of performance and limitations among existing methods. In this paper, six representative methods proposed in the latest six years are compared. These include one-stage and two-stage approaches, working with raw intensity ratio data and discretized data respectively. They are based on various techniques such as kernel regression, correlation matrix diagonal segmentation, semi-parametric permutation and cyclic permutation schemes. We explore multiple criteria including type I error rate, detection power, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and the area under curve (AUC), and computational complexity, to evaluate performance of the methods under multiple simulation scenarios. We also characterize their abilities on applications to two real datasets obtained from cancers with lung adenocarcinoma and glioblastoma. This comparison study reveals general characteristics of the existing methods for identifying recurrent CNAs, and further provides new insights into their strengths and weaknesses. It is believed helpful to accelerate the development of novel and improved methods.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaArea Under CurveComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanGlioblastomaHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasmsRecurrenceROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID23285074
PMCPMC3527554
OpenAlexW1965023353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.