ArticlePloS one2012
Antitumor effects of combining docetaxel (taxotere) with the antivascular action of ultrasound stimulated microbubbles.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sonoporation for Augmenting Chemotherapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020Trial
- Effect of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles on Blood Perfusion in Invasive Breast Cancer-A Prospective Clinical Trial.Technology in cancer research & treatmentTrial
- Transient tumor perfusion loss: evaluating the spatial and temporal dynamics of blood flow changes induced by ultrasound cavitation treatments.Ultrasonics · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative effects of focused ultrasound and microbubbles on healthy and tumor bearing rat spinal cord.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Focused Ultrasound for Sarcomas: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Delivery of Cavitation Therapy With a Modified Clinical Scanner: In Vitro Evaluation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Article
- In vivo high-speed microscopy of microbubbles in the chorioallantoic membrane model.Theranostics · 2024Article
- Radioenhancement with the Combination of Docetaxel and Ultrasound Microbubbles: In Vivo Prostate Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- MR-guided ultrasound-stimulated microbubble therapy enhances radiation-induced tumor response.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- AMPK is required for recovery from metabolic stress induced by ultrasound microbubble treatment.iScience · 2023Article
- Theranostics in the vasculature: bioeffects of ultrasound and microbubbles to induce vascular shutdown.Theranostics · 2023Review
- Intravital imaging and cavitation monitoring of antivascular ultrasound in tumor microvasculature.Theranostics · 2023Article
- Article
- Application of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Contrast Agents for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging: Value and Progression.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles Inhibit Aggressive Phenotypes and Promotes Radiosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Ultrasound and Microbubbles for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: From Preclinical Research towards Clinical Application.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Effects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound treatment on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Theranostics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound stimulated microbubbles (USMB) are being investigated for their potential to promote the uptake of anticancer agents into tumor tissue by exploiting their ability to enhance microvascular permeability. At sufficiently high ultrasound transmit amplitudes it has also recently been shown that USMB treatments can, on their own, induce vascular damage, shutdown blood flow, and inhibit tumor growth. The objective of this study is to examine the antitumor effects of 'antivascular' USMB treatments in conjunction with chemotherapy, which differs from previous work which has sought to enhance drug uptake with USMBs by increasing vascular permeability. Conceptually this is a strategy similar to combining vascular disrupting agents with a chemotherapy, and we have selected the taxane docetaxel (Taxotere) for evaluating this approach as it has previously been shown to have potent antitumor effects when combined with small molecule vascular disrupting agents. Experiments were conducted on PC3 tumors implanted in athymic mice. USMB treatments were performed at a frequency of 1 MHz employing sequences of 50 ms bursts (0.00024 duty cycle) at 1.65 MPa. USMB treatments were administered on a weekly basis for 4 weeks with docetaxel (DTX) being given intravenously at a dose level of 5 mg/kg. The USMB treatments, either alone or in combination with DTX, induced an acute reduction in tumor perfusion which was accompanied at the 24 hour point by significantly enhanced necrosis and apoptosis. Longitudinal experiments showed a modest prolongation in survival but no significant growth inhibition occurred in DTX-only and USMB-only treatment groups relative to control tumors. The combined USMB-DTX treatment group produced tumor shrinkage in weeks 4-6, and significant growth inhibition and survival prolongation relative to the control (p<0.001), USMB-only (p<0.01) and DTX-only treatment groups (p<0.01). These results suggest the potential of enhancing the antitumor activity of docetaxel by combining it with antivascular USMB effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.