Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23284942›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Gross karyotypic and phenotypic alterations among different progenies of the Candida glabrata CBS138/ATCC2001 reference strain.

Oliver Bader, Alexander Schwarz, Eefje A Kraneveld, Marut Tangwattanachuleeporn, Marut Tangwattanchuleeporn, Pia Schmidt, Mette D Jacobsen, Uwe Gross, Piet W J De Groot, Michael Weig

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative Genomics of SerialAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  14. Microorganisms · 2019
    Review
  15. Inflammatory Cell Recruitment inJournal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  18. Adhesins inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Comparative Genomics of Two SequentialG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Tangwattanchuleeporn, Marut [corrected to Tangwattanachuleeporn, Marut]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Oliver BaderInstitute for Medical Microbiology and German National Reference Center for Systemic Mycoses, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Alexander Schwarz
Eefje A Kraneveld
Marut Tangwattanachuleeporn
Marut Tangwattanchuleeporn
Pia Schmidt
Mette D Jacobsen
Uwe Gross
Piet W J De Groot
Michael Weig
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F00513X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic plasticity is a mechanism for adaptation to environmental cues such as host responses and antifungal drug pressure in many fungi including the human pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata. In this study we evaluated the phenotypic and genotypic stability of the world-wide used C. glabrata reference strain CBS138/ATCC2001 under laboratory conditions. A set of ten lineages of this wild type strain and genetically modified progenies were obtained from different scientific laboratories, and analyzed for genotypic and phenotypic alterations. Even though the derivates were indistinguishable by multi locus sequence typing, different phenotypic groups that correlated with specific karyotypic changes were observed. In addition, modifications in the adherence capacity to plastic surface emerged that were shown to correlate with quantitative changes in adhesin gene expression rather than subtelomeric gene loss or differences in the number of macrosatellite repeats within adhesin genes. These results confirm the genomic plasticity of C. glabrata and show that chromosomal aberrations and functional adaptations may occur not only during infection and under antimicrobial therapy, but also under laboratory conditions without extreme selective pressures. These alterations can significantly affect phenotypic properties such as cell surface attributes including adhesion and the cell wall carbohydrate composition and therefore, if unnoticed, may adulterate the outcome of genetic studies.

Indexed as

Candida glabrataFungal ProteinsGenome, FungalKaryotypingFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23284942
PMCPMC3527424
OpenAlexW2016306656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.