ArticlePLoS genetics2012
Genome-wide fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
187 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential introgression of mutations reveals selection in spruce.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.Genetics · 2026Article
- Inferring fine-scale rates of mutation and recombination in the coppery titi monkey (Plecturocebus cupreus).Heredity · 2026Article
- Comparing the genomic inbreeding of an isolated rhesus macaque study population to wild populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Non-uniform chromosomal SNP density biases sites of meiotic crossovers in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Variable jackpot individuals provide most alleles for repeated, rapid adaptation to freshwater by anadromous Threespine Stickleback.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026Review
- Recombination suppression in plant adaptation and speciation.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Natural selection and recombination interact to structure genome-wide variation in pines.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Rare jackpot individuals drive rapid adaptation in Threespine Stickleback.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- GENERAL MOMENT CLOSURE FOR THE NEUTRAL TWO-LOCUS WRIGHT-FISHER DYNAMICS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Selecting a Window Size for Phylogenomic Analyses of Whole Genome Alignments Using AIC.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Non-uniform chromosomal SNP density biases sites of meiotic crossovers inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mixed Outcomes in Recombination Rates After Domestication: Revisiting Theory and Data.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Analytical expectations for ancestry junction accumulation in admixed genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A high-resolution crossover landscape in Drosophila santomea reveals rapid and concerted evolution of multiple properties of crossing over control.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Recent rapid radiation of apex predators suggests dramatic biodiversity turnover in an ancient lake.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evolution of GC-biased gene conversion by natural selection.Genetics · 2025Article
127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating fine-scale recombination maps of Drosophila from population genomic data is a challenging problem, in particular because of the high background recombination rate. In this paper, a new computational method is developed to address this challenge. Through an extensive simulation study, it is demonstrated that the method allows more accurate inference, and exhibits greater robustness to the effects of natural selection and noise, compared to a well-used previous method developed for studying fine-scale recombination rate variation in the human genome. As an application, a genome-wide analysis of genetic variation data is performed for two Drosophila melanogaster populations, one from North America (Raleigh, USA) and the other from Africa (Gikongoro, Rwanda). It is shown that fine-scale recombination rate variation is widespread throughout the D. melanogaster genome, across all chromosomes and in both populations. At the fine-scale, a conservative, systematic search for evidence of recombination hotspots suggests the existence of a handful of putative hotspots each with at least a tenfold increase in intensity over the background rate. A wavelet analysis is carried out to compare the estimated recombination maps in the two populations and to quantify the extent to which recombination rates are conserved. In general, similarity is observed at very broad scales, but substantial differences are seen at fine scales. The average recombination rate of the X chromosome appears to be higher than that of the autosomes in both populations, and this pattern is much more pronounced in the African population than the North American population. The correlation between various genomic features-including recombination rates, diversity, divergence, GC content, gene content, and sequence quality-is examined using the wavelet analysis, and it is shown that the most notable difference between D. melanogaster and humans is in the correlation between recombination and diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.