Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23284288›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Genome-wide fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Andrew H Chan, Paul A Jenkins, Yun S Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. GENERAL MOMENT CLOSURE FOR THE NEUTRAL TWO-LOCUS WRIGHT-FISHER DYNAMICS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Non-uniform chromosomal SNP density biases sites of meiotic crossovers inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew H ChanComputer Science Division, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Paul A Jenkins
Yun S Song

Funding

Mathematical Models and Statistical Methods for Large-Scale Population GenomicsR01GM094402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SONG, YUN S · 2010 to 2018
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094402NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM094402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating fine-scale recombination maps of Drosophila from population genomic data is a challenging problem, in particular because of the high background recombination rate. In this paper, a new computational method is developed to address this challenge. Through an extensive simulation study, it is demonstrated that the method allows more accurate inference, and exhibits greater robustness to the effects of natural selection and noise, compared to a well-used previous method developed for studying fine-scale recombination rate variation in the human genome. As an application, a genome-wide analysis of genetic variation data is performed for two Drosophila melanogaster populations, one from North America (Raleigh, USA) and the other from Africa (Gikongoro, Rwanda). It is shown that fine-scale recombination rate variation is widespread throughout the D. melanogaster genome, across all chromosomes and in both populations. At the fine-scale, a conservative, systematic search for evidence of recombination hotspots suggests the existence of a handful of putative hotspots each with at least a tenfold increase in intensity over the background rate. A wavelet analysis is carried out to compare the estimated recombination maps in the two populations and to quantify the extent to which recombination rates are conserved. In general, similarity is observed at very broad scales, but substantial differences are seen at fine scales. The average recombination rate of the X chromosome appears to be higher than that of the autosomes in both populations, and this pattern is much more pronounced in the African population than the North American population. The correlation between various genomic features-including recombination rates, diversity, divergence, GC content, gene content, and sequence quality-is examined using the wavelet analysis, and it is shown that the most notable difference between D. melanogaster and humans is in the correlation between recombination and diversity.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenome, InsectRecombination, GeneticAfricaAnimalsBase CompositionChromosomesCrossing Over, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationMetagenomicsNorth AmericaPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID23284288
PMCPMC3527307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.