Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23284287›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Population Genomics of sub-saharan Drosophila melanogaster: African diversity and non-African admixture.

John E Pool, Russell B Corbett-Detig, Ryuichi P Sugino, Kristian A Stevens, Charis M Cardeno, Marc W Crepeau, Pablo Duchen, J J Emerson, Perot Saelao, David J Begun and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 225 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
225citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

225 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Naturally Occurring Variability in the Regulatory Region of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Climate predictsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The ongoing invasion of the endogenous retrovirusbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John E PoolLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. jpool@wisc.edu
Russell B Corbett-Detig
Ryuichi P Sugino
Kristian A Stevens
Charis M Cardeno
Marc W Crepeau
Pablo Duchen
J J Emerson
Perot Saelao
David J Begun
Charles H Langley

Funding

Drosophila Population GenomicsR01HG002942 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LANGLEY, CHARLES HUNT · 2004 to 2011
$8.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02942NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster has played a pivotal role in the development of modern population genetics. However, many basic questions regarding the demographic and adaptive history of this species remain unresolved. We report the genome sequencing of 139 wild-derived strains of D. melanogaster, representing 22 population samples from the sub-Saharan ancestral range of this species, along with one European population. Most genomes were sequenced above 25X depth from haploid embryos. Results indicated a pervasive influence of non-African admixture in many African populations, motivating the development and application of a novel admixture detection method. Admixture proportions varied among populations, with greater admixture in urban locations. Admixture levels also varied across the genome, with localized peaks and valleys suggestive of a non-neutral introgression process. Genomes from the same location differed starkly in ancestry, suggesting that isolation mechanisms may exist within African populations. After removing putatively admixed genomic segments, the greatest genetic diversity was observed in southern Africa (e.g. Zambia), while diversity in other populations was largely consistent with a geographic expansion from this potentially ancestral region. The European population showed different levels of diversity reduction on each chromosome arm, and some African populations displayed chromosome arm-specific diversity reductions. Inversions in the European sample were associated with strong elevations in diversity across chromosome arms. Genomic scans were conducted to identify loci that may represent targets of positive selection within an African population, between African populations, and between European and African populations. A disproportionate number of candidate selective sweep regions were located near genes with varied roles in gene regulation. Outliers for Europe-Africa F(ST) were found to be enriched in genomic regions of locally elevated cosmopolitan admixture, possibly reflecting a role for some of these loci in driving the introgression of non-African alleles into African populations.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, InsectMetagenomicsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAfrica South of the SaharaAllelesAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophila melanogasterEuropeEvolution, MolecularHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID23284287
PMCPMC3527209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.