Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23283926›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2013

Electronic dental record use and clinical information management patterns among practitioner-investigators in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Titus Schleyer, Mei Song, Gregg H Gilbert, D Brad Rindal, Jeffrey L Fellows, Valeria V Gordan, Ellen Funkhouser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Literature Review of Quality Management Initiatives in Dental Clinics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Usability Assessment of Salud Electronic Dental Record System.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Feasibility and usability of measuring receipt of sealants in 2 states.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Titus SchleyerCenter for Dental Informatics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Suite 339, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. titus@pitt.edu
Mei Song
Gregg H Gilbert
D Brad Rindal
Jeffrey L Fellows
Valeria V Gordan
Ellen Funkhouser

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
Dental PBRN Network ChairU01DE016747 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2005 to 2011
$17.3M
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Coordinating CtrU01DE016746 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FUNKHOUSER, ELLEN M · 2005 to 2011
$7.0M
Data Extraction using EDR in Dental PBRNR21DE021178 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCHLEYER, TITUS K. · 2011 to 2012
$425k
A Standard Information Model for General Dental RecordsR21DE019683 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCHLEYER, TITUS K. · 2010 to 2011
$414k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE019683NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE021178NIDCR NIH HHS R21-DE-19683NIDCR NIH HHS R21-DE-21178NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16746NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16747NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19-DE-22516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing availability of electronic data offers practitioners increased opportunities for reusing clinical data for research and quality improvement. However, relatively little is known about what clinical data practitioners keep on their computers regarding patients.

methodsThe authors conducted a web-based survey of 991 U.S. and Scandinavian practitioner-investigators (P-Is) in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network to determine the extent of their use of computers to manage clinical information; the type of patient information they kept on paper, a computer or both; and their willingness to reuse electronic dental record (EDR) data for research.

resultsA total of 729 (73.6 percent) of 991 P-Is responded.A total of 73.8 percent of U.S. solo practitioners and 78.7 percent of group practitioners used a computer to manage some patient information, and 14.3 percent and 15.9 percent, respectively, managed all patient information on a computer. U.S. practitioners stored appointments, treatment plans, completed treatment and images electronically most frequently, and the periodontal charting, diagnosis, medical history, progress notes and the chief complaint least frequently.More than 90 percent of Scandinavian practitioners stored all information electronically.A total of 50.8 percent of all P-Is were willing to reuse EDR data for research, and 63.1 percent preferred electronic forms for data collection.

conclusionThe results of this study show that the trend toward increased adoption of EDRs in the United States is continuing, potentially making more data in electronic form available for research. Participants appear to be willing to reuse EDR data for research and to collect data electronically. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The rising rates of EDR adoption may offer increased opportunities for reusing electronic data for quality improvement and research.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchDental InformaticsDental RecordsDental ResearchHealth Information ManagementAppointments and SchedulesAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersComputer SystemsData MiningDentistsDiagnosis, OralElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGroup Practice, DentalHumans

Identifiers

PMID23283926
PMCPMC3539217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.