ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2013
Influence of platelet reactivity on clinical outcome of patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2021Article
- Impact of cigarette smoking on P2Y12 receptor binding activity before and after clopidogrel therapy in patients with coronary artery disease.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin is actually recommended for cardiovascular prevention in patients with stable coronary disease, whereas dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) represents the established treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, recurrent ischemic events occur in patients on treatment with clopidogrel; this may be due to low responsiveness to this agent, a phenomenon influenced by environmental, clinical, and genetic factors. Different strategies have been tested to overcome this phenomenon, such as increase in clopidogrel loading and maintenance doses and use of newer P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor), which are by now indicated for patients with acute coronary syndromes; the latter agents have been associated with stronger antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel even in patients with stable coronary disease, but further studies are needed to test their net clinical benefit in this setting (reduction of ischemic events without increase in bleeding).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.