Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23283341›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

DRD4 genotype predicts longevity in mouse and human.

Deborah L Grady, Panayotis K Thanos, Maria M Corrada, Jeffrey C Barnett, Valentina Ciobanu, Diana Shustarovich, Anthony Napoli, Alexandra G Moyzis, David Grandy, Marcelo Rubinstein and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Klerman's "credo" reconsidered: neo-Kraepelinianism, Spitzer's views, and what we can learn from the past.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Deborah L GradyDepartment of Biological Chemistry, College of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA.
Panayotis K Thanos
Maria M Corrada
Jeffrey C Barnett
Valentina Ciobanu
Diana Shustarovich
Anthony Napoli
Alexandra G Moyzis
David Grandy
Marcelo Rubinstein
Gene-Jack Wang
Claudia H Kawas
Chuansheng Chen
Qi Dong
Eric Wang
Nora D Volkow
Robert K Moyzis
University of California, Irvine · USBrookhaven National Laboratory · USBeijing Normal University · CNConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AROregon Health & Science University · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

Diversity Supplement to R01AG021055; Clinical, Imaging, and Pathological Studies in the Oldest Old: The 90+ StudyR01AG021055 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CORRADA, MARIA, KAWAS, CLAUDIA H. · 2002 to 2024
$36.9M
Neurobiology of Substance Abuse & Addiction - Preclinical StudiesZIAAA000551 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI VOLKOW, NORA D. · 2009 to 2013
$8.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AA000551NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longevity is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. The brain's dopamine system may be particularly relevant, since it modulates traits (e.g., sensitivity to reward, incentive motivation, sustained effort) that impact behavioral responses to the environment. In particular, the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) has been shown to moderate the impact of environments on behavior and health. We tested the hypothesis that the DRD4 gene influences longevity and that its impact is mediated through environmental effects. Surviving participants of a 30-year-old population-based health survey (N = 310; age range, 90-109 years; the 90+ Study) were genotyped/resequenced at the DRD4 gene and compared with a European ancestry-matched younger population (N = 2902; age range, 7-45 years). We found that the oldest-old population had a 66% increase in individuals carrying the DRD4 7R allele relative to the younger sample (p = 3.5 × 10(-9)), and that this genotype was strongly correlated with increased levels of physical activity. Consistent with these results, DRD4 knock-out mice, when compared with wild-type and heterozygous mice, displayed a 7-9.7% decrease in lifespan, reduced spontaneous locomotor activity, and no lifespan increase when reared in an enriched environment. These results support the hypothesis that DRD4 gene variants contribute to longevity in humans and in mice, and suggest that this effect is mediated by shaping behavioral responses to the environment.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdolescentAdultAged, 80 and overAllelesAnimalsChildFemaleGene FrequencyHumansLongevityMaleMiceMice, KnockoutMiddle AgedMotor ActivityReceptors, Dopamine D4

Identifiers

PMID23283341
PMCPMC3710129
OpenAlexW2059700066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.