Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23283107›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2012

Sensitization to indigenous pollen and molds and other outdoor and indoor allergens in allergic patients from saudi arabia, United arab emirates, and Sudan.

S M Hasnain, A R Al-Frayh, J L Subiza, Enrique Fernández-Caldas, M Casanovas, T Geith, M O Gad-El-Rab, E Koshak, H Al-Mehdar, S Al-Sowaidi and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Towards standardized skin testing for drug-induced allergic reactions.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mapping the Burden of Fungal Diseases in the United Arab Emirates.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Atopy and allergic diseases among Saudi young adults: A cross-sectional study.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Article
  14. Immunological Factors Associated with Adult Asthma in the Aseer Region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Association of molds and metrological parameters to frequency of severe asthma exacerbation.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular biomarkers for grass pollen immunotherapy.World journal of methodology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

S M HasnainKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
A R Al-Frayh
J L Subiza
Enrique Fernández-Caldas
M Casanovas
T Geith
M O Gad-El-Rab
E Koshak
H Al-Mehdar
S Al-Sowaidi
H Al-Matar
R Khouqeer
K Al-Abbad
M Al-Yamani
E Alaqi
O A Musa
S Al-Sedairy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background: Airborne allergens vary from one climatic region to another. Therefore, it is important to analyze the environment of the region to select the most prevalent allergens for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic patients.

objective: To evaluate the prevalence of positive skin tests to pollen and fungal allergens collected from local indigenous plants or isolated molds, as well as other outdoor and indoor allergens in allergic patients in 6 different geographical areas in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the United Arab Emirates, and Sudan. MATERIAL AND

methods: Four hundred ninety-two consecutive patients evaluated at different Allergy Clinics (276 women and 256 men; mean age, 30 years) participated in this study. The selection of indigenous allergens was based on research findings in different areas from Riyadh and adjoining areas. Indigenous raw material for pollen grains was collected from the desert near the capital city of Riyadh, KSA. The following plants were included: Chenopodium murale, Salsola imbricata, Rumex vesicarius, Ricinus communis, Artiplex nummularia, Amaranthus viridis, Artemisia monosperma, Plantago boissieri, and Prosopis juliflora. Indigenous molds were isolated from air sampling in Riyadh and grown to obtain the raw material. These included the following: Ulocladium spp., Penicillium spp., Aspergillus fumigatus, Cladosporium spp., and Alternaria spp. The raw material was processed under Good Manufacturing Practices for skin testing. Other commercially available outdoor (grass and tree pollens) and indoor (mites, cockroach, and cat dander) allergens were also tested.

results: The highest sensitization to indigenous pollens was detected to C. murale (32%) in Khartoum (Sudan) and S. imbricata (30%) and P. juliflora (24%) in the Riyadh region. The highest sensitization to molds was detected in Khartoum, especially to Cladosporium spp. (42%), Aspergillus (40%), and Alternaria spp. (38%). Sensitization to mites was also very prevalent in Khartoum (72%), as well as in Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) (46%) and Jeddah (KSA) (30%).

conclusions: The allergenicity of several indigenous pollens and molds derived from autochthonous sources was demonstrated. Prevalence studies in different regions of KSA and neighbor countries indicate different sensitization rates to these and other outdoor and indoor allergens.

Identifiers

PMID23283107
PMCPMC3651151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.