ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
Mapping small molecule binding data to structural domains.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- DrugDomain 2.0: comprehensive database of protein domains-ligands/drugs interactions across the whole Protein Data Bank.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- DrugDomain 2.0: Comprehensive database of protein domains-ligands/drugs interactions across the whole Protein Data Bank.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- DrugDomain: The evolutionary context of drugs and small molecules bound to domains.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Better understanding the phenotypic effects of drugs through shared targets in genetic disease networks.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Protein domain-based prediction of drug/compound-target interactions and experimental validation on LIM kinases.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Natural Products for Drug Discovery in the 21st Century: Innovations for Novel Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Structural and Functional View of Polypharmacology.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- PPDMs-a resource for mapping small molecule bioactivities from ChEMBL to Pfam-A protein domains.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Paeonia lactiflora Pall. protects against ANIT-induced cholestasis by activating Nrf2 via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Article
- Analysis of individual protein regions provides novel insights on cancer pharmacogenomics.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Analysis of the protein domain and domain architecture content in fungi and its application in the search of new antifungal targets.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- The functional therapeutic chemical classification system.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- iPfam: a database of protein family and domain interactions found in the Protein Data Bank.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- The ChEMBL bioactivity database: an update.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- InCoB2012 Conference: from biological data to knowledge to technological breakthroughs.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge-scale bioactivity/SAR Open Data has recently become available, and this has allowed new analyses and approaches to be developed to help address the productivity and translational gaps of current drug discovery. One of the current limitations of these data is the relative sparsity of reported interactions per protein target, and complexities in establishing clear relationships between bioactivity and targets using bioinformatics tools. We detail in this paper the indexing of targets by the structural domains that bind (or are likely to bind) the ligand within a full-length protein. Specifically, we present a simple heuristic to map small molecule binding to Pfam domains. This profiling can be applied to all proteins within a genome to give some indications of the potential pharmacological modulation and regulation of all proteins.
resultsIn this implementation of our heuristic, ligand binding to protein targets from the ChEMBL database was mapped to structural domains as defined by profiles contained within the Pfam-A database. Our mapping suggests that the majority of assay targets within the current version of the ChEMBL database bind ligands through a small number of highly prevalent domains, and conversely the majority of Pfam domains sampled by our data play no currently established role in ligand binding. Validation studies, carried out firstly against Uniprot entries with expert binding-site annotation and secondly against entries in the wwPDB repository of crystallographic protein structures, demonstrate that our simple heuristic maps ligand binding to the correct domain in about 90 percent of all assessed cases. Using the mappings obtained with our heuristic, we have assembled ligand sets associated with each Pfam domain.
conclusionsSmall molecule binding has been mapped to Pfam-A domains of protein targets in the ChEMBL bioactivity database. The result of this mapping is an enriched annotation of small molecule bioactivity data and a grouping of activity classes following the Pfam-A specifications of protein domains. This is valuable for data-focused approaches in drug discovery, for example when extrapolating potential targets of a small molecule with known activity against one or few targets, or in the assessment of a potential target for drug discovery or screening studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.