ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
Medians seek the corners, and other conjectures.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the parameterized complexity of the median and closest problems under some permutation metrics.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2024Article
- Compromise or optimize? The breakpoint anti-median.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Fast ancestral gene order reconstruction of genomes with unequal gene content.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Comparative genomics meets topology: a novel view on genome median and halving problems.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Models and algorithms for genome rearrangement with positional constraints.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2016Article
- Reconstruction of ancestral gene orders using intermediate genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Near-medians that avoid the corners; a combinatorial probability approach.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Sets of medians in the non-geodesic pseudometric space of unsigned genomes with breakpoints.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Article
- Phase change for the accuracy of the median value in estimating divergence time.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedian construction is at the heart of several approaches to gene-order phylogeny. It has been observed that the solution to a median problem is generally not unique, and that alternate solutions may be quite different. Another concern has to do with a tendency for medians to fall on or near one of the three input orders, and hence to contain no information about the other two.
resultsWe conjecture that as gene orders become more random with respect to each other, and as the number of genes increases, the breakpoint median for circular unichromosomal genomes, in both the unsigned and signed cases, tends to approach one of the input genomes, the "corners" in terms of the distance normalized by the number of genes. Moreover, there are alternate solutions that approach each of the other inputs, so that the average distance between solutions is very large. We confirm these claims through simulations, and extend the results to medians of more than three genomes.
conclusionsThis effect also introduces serious biases into the medians of less scrambled genomes. It prompts a reconsideration of the role of the median in gene order phylogeny. Fortunately, for triples of finite length genomes, a small proportion of the median solutions escape the tendency towards the corners, and these are relatively close to each other. This suggests that a focused search for these solutions, though they represent a decreasing minority as genome length increases, is a way out of the pathological tendency we have described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.