Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23281691›Full record

ReviewPhotodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine2013

Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Andrew Kim, Benjamin F Chong

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An Update on the Pathogenesis of Skin Damage in Lupus.Current rheumatology reports · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. New concepts on abnormal UV reactions in systemic lupus erythematosus and a screening tool for assessment of photosensitivity.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Recent advances in cutaneous lupus.Journal of autoimmunity · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Immune Cell-Stromal Circuitry in Lupus Photosensitivity.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew KimDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75309-9069, USA.
Benjamin F Chong
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Molecular Markers in Discoid Lupus ErythematousK23AR061441 · NIAMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHONG, BENJAMIN FRANKLIN · 2012 to 2016
$653k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR061441NIAMS NIH HHS K23AR061441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltraviolet radiation (UVR) is a well-known exacerbating factor for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with photosensitivity comprising one of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, discerning true photosensitivity in this population is difficult due to the broad language utilized by the ACR and the delayed-onset nature of photosensitive lupus lesions.

aimsThe objective of this report is to provide a review of photosensitivity, photoprovocation, and phototherapy in the context of CLE patients.

methodsA literature review in PubMed was conducted using the terms 'ultraviolet light,' 'lupus erythematosus,' 'photoprovocation,' or 'photosensitivity.'

resultsSelf-patient reporting of photosensitivity and the broad definition of photosensitivity have led to the wide range of photosensitivity rates in CLE patients. Photoprovocation testing provides a more objective method to measure photosensitivity, but even these trials demonstrate significant differences due to protocol variations. Despite UVR's deleterious effect on lupus patients, ultraviolet A (UVA)-1 may have therapeutic benefits as shown by observations on murine models and human lupus subjects.

conclusionsAccurately discerning photosensitivity has diagnostic implications for SLE and provides motivation for greater patient adherence to photoprotective methods.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, CutaneousPhotosensitivity DisordersAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceUltraviolet Rays

Identifiers

PMID23281691
PMCPMC3539182
OpenAlexW1962516156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.