Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23281649›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2012

Abdominal negative-pressure therapy: a new method in countering abdominal compartment and peritonitis - prospective study and critical review of literature.

Haralds Plaudis, Agris Rudzats, Liene Melberga, Ita Kazaka, Olegs Suba, Guntars Pupelis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04986943 (Use of the ABTHERA ADVANCE™ Open Abdomen Dressing in Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04986943 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Use of the ABTHERA ADVANCE™ Open Abdomen Dressing in Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis

TypeobservationalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2020 to 2023Enrolled3ConditionsNecrotizing PancreatitisArmsUsing ABTHERA Advance without a Wittmann Patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Current concept of abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haralds PlaudisDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Riga East Clinical University Hospital "Gailezers", 2 Hipokrata Street, Riga, LV 1038, Latvia. hplaudis@gmail.com.
Agris Rudzats
Liene Melberga
Ita Kazaka
Olegs Suba
Guntars Pupelis
Riga East University Hospital · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApplication of abdominal negative-pressure therapy (NPT) is lifesaving when conservative measures fail to reduce sustained increase of the intra-abdominal pressure and it is impossible to achieve source control in a single operation due to severe peritonitis. The aim of this study is to share the initial experience with abdominal NPT in Latvia and provide a review of the relevant literature.

methodsIn total, 22 patients were included. All patients were treated with KCI® ABThera™ NPT systems. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score on admission, daily sequential organ failure assessment score and Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) were calculated for severity definition. The frequency of NPT system changes, daily amount of aspirated fluid effluent and the time of abdominal closure were assessed. The overall hospital and ICU stay, as well as the outcomes and the complication rate, were analysed.

resultsA complicated intra-abdominal infection was treated in 18 patients. Abdominal compartment syndrome due to severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), secondary ileus and damage control in polytrauma were indications for NPT in four patients. The median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 28 to 81), median APACHE II score was 15 points (range, 9 to 32) and median MPI was 28 points (range, 21 to 40), indicating a prognostic mortality risk of 60%. Sepsis developed in all patients, and in 20 of them, it was severe. NPT systems were changed on a median of every 4 days, and abdominal closure was feasible on the seventh postoperative day without needing a repeated laparotomy. Two NPT systems were removed due to bleeding from the retroperitoneal space in patients with SAP. Intestinal fistulae developed in three patients that were successfully treated conservatively. Incisional hernia occurred in three patients. The overall ICU and hospital stay were 14 (range, 5 to 56) and 25 days (range, 10 to 87), respectively. Only one patient died, contributing to the overall mortality of 4.5%.

conclusionsApplication of abdominal NPT could be a very promising technique for the control of sustained intra-abdominal hypertension and management of severe sepsis due to purulent peritonitis. Further trials are justified for a detailed evaluation of abdominal NPT indications.

Identifiers

PMID23281649
PMCPMC3527158
OpenAlexW2165640623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.