Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23281414›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2013

Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in studies of inherited arrhythmias.

Silvia G Priori, Carlo Napolitano, Elisa Di Pasquale, Gianluigi Condorelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early Atrial Remodeling Drives Arrhythmia in Fabry Disease.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biology open · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Implications of Cellular Aging in Cardiac Reprogramming.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hh signaling in regeneration of the ischemic heart.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Silvia G PrioriDivision of Cardiology and Molecular Cardiology, Maugeri Foundation-University of Pavia, Via Maugeri 10/10°, 27100 Pavia, Italy. silvia.priori@fsm.it
Carlo Napolitano
Elisa Di Pasquale
Gianluigi Condorelli

Funding

Telethon GGP11141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the genetic basis of inherited arrhythmias has paved the way for an improved understanding of arrhythmogenesis in a wide spectrum of life-threatening conditions. In vitro expression of mutations and transgenic animal models have been instrumental in enhancing this understanding, but the applicability of results to the human heart remains unknown. The ability to differentiate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSs) into cardiomyocytes enables the potential to generate patient-specific myocytes, which could be used to recapitulate the features of inherited arrhythmias in the context of the patient's genetic background. Few studies have been reported on iPS-derived myocytes obtained from patients with heritable arrhythmias, but they have demonstrated the applicability of this innovative approach to the study of inherited arrhythmias. Here we review the results achieved by iPS investigations in arrhythmogenic syndromes and discuss the existing challenges to be addressed before the use of iPS-derived myocytes can become a part of personalized management of inherited arrhythmias.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedArrhythmias, CardiacGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansMyocytes, Cardiac

Identifiers

PMID23281414
PMCPMC3533271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.