Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23281184›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2013

Comparison of DSC-MRI post-processing techniques in predicting microvascular histopathology in patients newly diagnosed with GBM.

Emma Essock-Burns, Joanna J Phillips, Annette M Molinaro, Janine M Lupo, Soonmee Cha, Susan M Chang, Sarah J Nelson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma Essock-BurnsThe UC Berkeley - UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. emma.essock-burns@ucsf.edu
Joanna J Phillips
Annette M Molinaro
Janine M Lupo
Soonmee Cha
Susan M Chang
Sarah J Nelson

Funding

Tissue CoreP50CA097257 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joseph F Costello · 2002 to 2026
$57.4M
Project 4: Multi-modality Metabolic Imaging for Monitoring Molecular Sub-types of GliomaP01CA118816 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joanna Phillips · 2007 to 2026
$44.7M
MR Metabolic Markers for Evaluation of Patients with Recurrent GliomaR01CA127612 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LI, YAN · 2008 to 2017
$3.8M
The role of microglia and macrophages in the development of brain tumorsK08NS063456 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PHILLIPS, JOANNA · 2008 to 2012
$854k
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 56006771NCI NIH HHS P01 CA11816-01A2NCI NIH HHS P01 CA118816NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097257NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127612NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127612-0ANINDS NIH HHS K08 NS063456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate which common post-processing method applied to gradient-echo DSC-MRI data, acquired with a single gadolinium injection and low flip-angle, most accurately reflects microvascular histopathology for patients with de novo, treatment-naive glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy-two tissue samples were collected from 35 patients with treatment-naive GBM. Sample locations were co-registered to preoperative gradient-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI acquired with 35° flip-angle and 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium. Estimates of blood volume and leakiness at each sample location were calculated using four common postprocessing methods (leakage-corrected nonlinear gamma-variate, non-parametric, scaled MR-signal, and unscaled MR-signal). Tissue sample microvascular morphology was characterized using Factor VIII immunohistochemical analysis. A random-effects regression model, adjusted for repeated measures and contrast-enhancement (CE), identified whether MR parameter estimates significantly predicted IHC findings.

resultsElevated blood volume estimates from nonlinear and non-parametric methods significantly predicted increased microvascular hyperplasia. Abnormal microvasculature existed beyond the CE-lesion and was significantly reflected by increased blood volume from nonlinear, non-parametric, and scaled MR-signal analysis.

conclusionThis study provides histopathological support for both non-parametric and nonlinear post-processing of low flip-angle DSC-MRI for characterizing microvascular hyperplasia within GBM. Non-parametric analysis with a single gadolinium injection may be a particularly useful strategy clinically, as it requires less computational expense and limits gadolinium exposure.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsCerebral ArteriesFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMicrovesselsMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsDSC post-processinglow flip anglemicrovascular histopathologyperfusion MRItissue sample

Identifiers

PMID23281184
PMCPMC3711964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.