Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23280632›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2013

Intentions for bilateral mastectomy among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Lesley King, Suzanne C O'Neill, Elizabeth Spellman, Beth N Peshkin, Heiddis Valdimarsdottir, Shawna Willey, Kara Grace Leventhal, Tiffani DeMarco, Rachel Nusbaum, Elizabeth Feldman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy as predictors of preparedness for oncology clinical trials: a mediational model.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lesley KingDepartment of Oncology, Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Familial Cancer Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia 20007, USA.
Suzanne C O'Neill
Elizabeth Spellman
Beth N Peshkin
Heiddis Valdimarsdottir
Shawna Willey
Kara Grace Leventhal
Tiffani DeMarco
Rachel Nusbaum
Elizabeth Feldman
Lina Jandorf
Marc D Schwartz

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Decisions &Outcomes of BRCA1/2 Test for Breast PatientsR01CA074861 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, MARC D · 1997 to 2008
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074861NCI NIH HHS R01 CA74861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent trends suggest that bilateral mastectomy (BM) is on the rise among women diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. Few studies have investigated the factors associated with the decision to have more aggressive surgery among young, high risk patients.

methodsAs part of a larger study, 284 women aged 50 and under completed an initial survey within 6 weeks of a breast cancer diagnosis. We assessed sociodemographics, medical and family history variables, treatment recommendations, preferences and concerns, distress, perceived risk, knowledge, and neuroticism. We used multiple regression with backward entry to assess the relationship between these variables and our outcomes of decisional conflict and intentions for BM.

resultsHigher decisional conflict was associated with being less educated, unmarried, more anxious and less likely to have received a surgical recommendation. Preference for BM was associated with higher neuroticism, perceived risk for contralateral breast cancer, pre-testing risk of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation, having received either a surgical recommendation (vs. no recommendation), and lower preference for lumpectomy.

conclusionsFor younger women, a surgical recommendation is associated with lower decisional conflict and stronger intention for BM. Results highlight the importance of effective risk communication and decision support between a woman and her surgeon.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalDecision MakingIntentionMastectomy, Modified RadicalPatient ParticipationAdultAnxiety DisordersBreast NeoplasmsEducational StatusFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansLinear ModelsMarital StatusMastectomy, Segmental

Identifiers

PMID23280632
PMCPMC3687585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.