Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23280228›Full record

ArticleJAMA2013

Outcomes using lower vs higher hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion.

Jeffrey L Carson, Paul A Carless, Paul C Hébert

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02648113 (Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility of Liberal vs Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anaemia. The REALITY), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02648113 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility of Liberal vs Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anaemia. The REALITY (REstrictive And LIberal Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Acute mYocardial Infarction) Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2016 to 2020Enrolled668ConditionsMyocardial Infarction, Anemia, Blood TransfusionArmsRestrictive transfusion, Liberal transfusion, red blood transfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Application of Perioperative Transfusion Trigger Score in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment of Malignant Tumor.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey L CarsonDivision of General Internal Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA. carson@umdnj.edu
Paul A Carless
Paul C Hébert
Northwestern University · USJohnson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical questionIs a lower vs higher hemoglobin threshold best for minimizing both red blood cell use and adverse clinical outcomes when used to trigger red blood cell transfusions in anemic patients in critical care and acute care settings? BOTTOM LINE: Compared with higher hemoglobin thresholds, a hemoglobin threshold of 7 or 8 g/dL is associated with fewer red blood cell units transfused without adverse associations with mortality, cardiac morbidity, functional recovery, or length of hospital stay.

Identifiers

PMID23280228
OpenAlexW2094746327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.