Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23279082›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

'Someone should oversee it': patient perspectives on the ethical issues arising with the regulation of probiotics.

Krista L Harrison, Ruth M Farrell, Margaret A Brinich, Janelle Highland, MaryBeth Mercer, Jennifer B McCormick, Jon Tilburt, Gail Geller, Patricia Marshall, Richard R Sharp

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Probiotic-Based Materials as Living Therapeutics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Tumor-Associated Microbiome: Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Krista L HarrisonBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ruth M Farrell
Margaret A Brinich
Janelle Highland
MaryBeth Mercer
Jennifer B McCormick
Jon Tilburt
Gail Geller
Patricia Marshall
Richard R Sharp

Funding

Patient perceptions of bioengineered probiotics and clinical metagenomicsR01HG004877 · NHGRI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI FARRELL, RUTH, SHARP, RICHARD R. · 2008 to 2010
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004877NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG004877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough many probiotic products are currently available in yogurt or pill form in the United States (US), there is uncertainty surrounding the structure of regulation of these products. As more therapeutic probiotics are developed, changes to existing regulatory process in the United States may be required to meet the needs of patients and users in the population.

objectiveThis study examined how patients with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) diseases view the regulation of probiotics.

designWe conducted a multi-site qualitative study consisting of focus groups of patients with chronic gastrointestinal diseases at three tertiary hospitals: at [institutions removed for blinded review].

resultsWe conducted 22 focus groups with 136 patients with major gastrointestinal (GI) diseases between March and August 2009. Participants were not familiar with the existing regulation of probiotic products but wanted assurances of accurate labelling of strain as well as safety. Participants raised concerns that regulation of probiotics might be accompanied by greater costs, reduced access and increased involvement of pharmaceutical companies. Although participants voiced significant doubt of government regulators, they felt that products containing genetically modified probiotic strains should have oversight comparable to that of pharmaceutical drugs. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionIf GI patient perspectives are indicative of public perceptions of therapeutic probiotics in the United States, consumers may expect more rigorous regulation in the future while simultaneously wanting low costs, easy access and low involvement of pharmaceutical companies. Manufacturers, translational scientists, clinicians and regulators should be sensitive to consumer attitudes when designing, testing and regulating new therapeutic probiotics.

Indexed as

Government RegulationProbioticsChronic DiseaseFemaleFocus GroupsGastrointestinal DiseasesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePerceptionSocioeconomic FactorsTertiary Care CentersUnited Statesbioethicsgovernment regulationmetagenomeprobioticsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID23279082
PMCPMC4022694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.