ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015
'Someone should oversee it': patient perspectives on the ethical issues arising with the regulation of probiotics.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomised controlled trial ofBMJ open · 2017Trial
- Next-Generation Microencapsulation Technologies for Probiotic Protection and Precision Delivery.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- Probiotic-Based Materials as Living Therapeutics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Evaluating the scientific evidence to support mental health and well-being claims made on probiotic products.Nutrition and health · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Gastrointestinal Disorder Management: Cutting-Edge Advances and Future Prospects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Ethical challenges in conducting and the clinical application of human microbiome research.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2023Article
- Tumor-Associated Microbiome: Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Help, hope and hype: ethical considerations of human microbiome research and applications.Protein & cell · 2018Article
- The Human Microbiome and Public Health: Social and Ethical Considerations.American journal of public health · 2016Article
- Maternal perspectives on the use of probiotics in infants: a cross-sectional survey.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough many probiotic products are currently available in yogurt or pill form in the United States (US), there is uncertainty surrounding the structure of regulation of these products. As more therapeutic probiotics are developed, changes to existing regulatory process in the United States may be required to meet the needs of patients and users in the population.
objectiveThis study examined how patients with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) diseases view the regulation of probiotics.
designWe conducted a multi-site qualitative study consisting of focus groups of patients with chronic gastrointestinal diseases at three tertiary hospitals: at [institutions removed for blinded review].
resultsWe conducted 22 focus groups with 136 patients with major gastrointestinal (GI) diseases between March and August 2009. Participants were not familiar with the existing regulation of probiotic products but wanted assurances of accurate labelling of strain as well as safety. Participants raised concerns that regulation of probiotics might be accompanied by greater costs, reduced access and increased involvement of pharmaceutical companies. Although participants voiced significant doubt of government regulators, they felt that products containing genetically modified probiotic strains should have oversight comparable to that of pharmaceutical drugs. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionIf GI patient perspectives are indicative of public perceptions of therapeutic probiotics in the United States, consumers may expect more rigorous regulation in the future while simultaneously wanting low costs, easy access and low involvement of pharmaceutical companies. Manufacturers, translational scientists, clinicians and regulators should be sensitive to consumer attitudes when designing, testing and regulating new therapeutic probiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.