ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2013
Effects of fluid flow conditions on interactions between species in biofilms.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agent-based modeling of erosion and sloughing during growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Microfluidic investigation of the impacts of flow fluctuations on the development of Pseudomonas putida biofilms.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2023Article
- DynamicBiofilm · 2022Article
- What makes another life possible in bacteria? Global regulators as architects of bacterial biofilms.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Review
- Experimental study on volatile sulfur compound inhibition using a single-chamber membrane-free microbial electrolysis cell.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Microbial competition in porous environments can select against rapid biofilm growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Intrinsic and Extrinsic Aspects onFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- In Situ Biomineralization and Particle Deposition Distinctively Mediate Biofilm Susceptibility to Chlorine.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2016Review
- Biofilm models of polymicrobial infection.Future microbiology · 2015Review
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa promotes Escherichia coli biofilm formation in nutrient-limited medium.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most microorganisms live in complex communities, where they interact both synergistically and competitively. To explore the relationship between environmental heterogeneity and the spatial structure of well-defined biofilms, single- and mixed-species biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Flavobacterium sp. CDC-65 was grown in a planar flow cell under highly controlled flow gradients. Both organisms behaved differently in mixed cultures than in single-species cultures due to inter-species interactions, and these interactions were significantly affected by external flow conditions. Pseudomonas and Flavobacterium showed a competitive relationship under slow inflow conditions, where the supply of growth medium was limited. Under such competitive conditions, the faster- specific growth rate of Flavobacterium allowed it to secure access to favorable regions of the biofilm by overgrowing Pseudomonas. In contrast, Pseudomonas was restricted to nutritionally depleted habitat near the base of the biofilm, and its growth was significantly inhibited. Conversely, under higher inflow conditions providing greater influx of growth medium, both organisms accumulated greater biomass in mixed biofilms than in single-species biofilms. Spatial segregation of the two organisms within the biofilms contributed to enhanced overall exploitation of available nutrients and substrates, while morphological changes favored better adherence to the surface under high hydrodynamic shear. These results indicate that synergy and competition in biofilms vary with flow conditions. Limited resource replenishment favors competition under low-flow conditions, while high flow reduces competition and favors synergy by providing greater resources and simultaneously imposing increased hydrodynamic shear that makes it more difficult to accumulate biomass on the surface. Ecological interactions that produce mechanically stronger and more robust biofilms will support more extensive growth on surfaces subject to high hydrodynamic shear, but these interactions are difficult to predict from observations of the behavior of individual organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.