Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23277560›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Analysis of natural variation reveals neurogenetic networks for Drosophila olfactory behavior.

Shilpa Swarup, Wen Huang, Trudy F C Mackay, Robert R H Anholt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms of Variability Underlying Odor-Guided Locomotion.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  10. Exercise-induced changes in climbing performance.Royal Society open science · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shilpa SwarupDepartment of Genetics, WM Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7614, USA.
Wen Huang
Trudy F C Mackay
Robert R H Anholt

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Olfaction in DrosophiliaR01GM059469 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 1999 to 2016
$5.8M
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI IN DROSOPHILAR01GM045146 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 1991 to 2012
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045146NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059469NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM45146NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM59469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between genetic variation and phenotypic variation for quantitative traits is necessary for predicting responses to natural and artificial selection and disease risk in human populations, but is challenging because of large sample sizes required to detect and validate loci with small effects. Here, we used the inbred, sequenced, wild-derived lines of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) to perform three complementary genome-wide association (GWA) studies for natural variation in olfactory behavior. The first GWA focused on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with mean differences in olfactory behavior in the DGRP, the second was an extreme quantitative trait locus GWA on an outbred advanced intercross population derived from extreme DGRP lines, and the third was for SNPs affecting the variance among DGRP lines. No individual SNP in any analysis was associated with variation in olfactory behavior by using a strict threshold accounting for multiple tests, and no SNP overlapped among the analyses. However, combining the top SNPs from all three analyses revealed a statistically enriched network of genes involved in cellular signaling and neural development. We used mutational and gene expression analyses to validate both candidate genes and network connectivity at a high rate. The lack of replication between the GWA analyses, small marginal SNP effects, and convergence on common cellular networks were likely attributable to epistasis. These results suggest that fully understanding the genotype-phenotype relationship requires a paradigm shift from a focus on single SNPs to pathway associations.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, InsectGenetic Association StudiesGenetics, BehavioralGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleModels, GeneticModels, NeurologicalNeurogenesisPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID23277560
PMCPMC3549129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.