Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23277330›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2013

γδT cells elicited by CMV reactivation after allo-SCT cross-recognize CMV and leukemia.

W Scheper, S van Dorp, S Kersting, F Pietersma, C Lindemans, S Hol, S Heijhuurs, Z Sebestyen, C Gründer, V Marcu-Malina and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. γδ T cells show distinct responses to CMV after stem cell transplantation.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. γδ T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. NK-like CD8Science immunology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

W ScheperDepartment of Hematology and Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S van Dorp
S Kersting
F Pietersma
C Lindemans
S Hol
S Heijhuurs
Z Sebestyen
C Gründer
V Marcu-Malina
A Marchant
C Donner
B Plachter
D Vermijlen
D van Baarle
J Kuball
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEErasmus Hospital · BEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Worldwide Cancer Research 10-0736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and relapse of disease remain major problems after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), in particular in combination with CMV-negative donors or cordblood transplantations. Recent data suggest a paradoxical association between CMV reactivation after allo-SCT and reduced leukemic relapse. Given the potential of Vδ2-negative γδT cells to recognize CMV-infected cells and tumor cells, the molecular biology of distinct γδT-cell subsets expanding during CMV reactivation after allo-SCT was investigated. Vδ2(neg) γδT-cell expansions after CMV reactivation were observed not only with conventional but also cordblood donors. Expanded γδT cells were capable of recognizing both CMV-infected cells and primary leukemic blasts. CMV and leukemia reactivity were restricted to the same clonal population, whereas other Vδ2(neg) T cells interact with dendritic cells (DCs). Cloned Vδ1 T-cell receptors (TCRs) mediated leukemia reactivity and DC interactions, but surprisingly not CMV reactivity. Interestingly, CD8αα expression appeared to be a signature of γδT cells after CMV exposure. However, functionally, CD8αα was primarily important in combination with selected leukemia-reactive Vδ1 TCRs, demonstrating for the first time a co-stimulatory role of CD8αα for distinct γδTCRs. Based on these observations, we advocate the exploration of adoptive transfer of unmodified Vδ2(neg) γδT cells after allo-SCT to tackle CMV reactivation and residual leukemic blasts, as well as application of leukemia-reactive Vδ1 TCR-engineered T cells as alternative therapeutic tools.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationVirus ActivationCytomegalovirusHumansLeukemiaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTransplantation, HomologousReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta

Identifiers

PMID23277330
OpenAlexW2036843903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.