Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23276777›Full record

Trial reportPreventive medicine2013

PROSPER community-university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial.

Richard Spoth, Cleve Redmond, Chungyeol Shin, Mark Greenberg, Mark Feinberg, Lisa Schainker

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Family-based prevention programmes for alcohol use in young people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. For Whom Do Parenting Interventions to Prevent Adolescent Substance Use Work?Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Universal school-based prevention for illicit drug use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms and the "Tightknittedness" of Friendship Groups.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2020
    Trial
  9. Examining the Highs and Lows of the Collaborative Relationship Between Technical Assistance Providers and Prevention Implementers.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Improvements in Capacity Among Community Coalitions Receiving Technical Assistance Through the Coalition Check-Up.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard SpothPartnerships in Prevention Science Institute, Iowa State University, 2625 N Loop Drive, Suite 2400, Ames, IA 50010, USA. rlspoth@iastate.edu
Cleve Redmond
Chungyeol Shin
Mark Greenberg
Mark Feinberg
Lisa Schainker

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA 013709NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effects of a delivery system for evidence-based preventive interventions through 12th grade, 6.5 years past baseline.

methodA cohort sequential design included 28 public school districts randomly assigned to the partnership delivery system or usual-programming conditions. At baseline, 11,960 students participated. Partnerships supported community teams that implemented a family-focused intervention in 6th grade and a school-based intervention in 7th grade. Outcome measures included lifetime, current misuse, and frequencies of misuse, for a range of substances. Intent-to-treat, multilevel analyses of covariance of point-in-time misuse and analyses of growth in misuse were conducted.

resultsResults showed significantly lower substance misuse in the intervention group at one or both time points for most outcomes, with relative reduction rates of up to 31.4%. There was significantly slower growth in misuse in the intervention group for 8 of the 10 outcomes. In addition, risk moderation results indicated that there were significantly greater intervention benefits for higher- versus lower-risk youth, for the misuse of 6 of the 10 substances at 11th grade, illicit substances at 12th grade, and growth in the misuse of illicit substances.

conclusionPartnership-based delivery systems for brief universal interventions have potential for public health impact by reducing substance misuse among youth, particularly higher-risk youth.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsAdolescentChildCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIowaMalePennsylvaniaRisk AssessmentRisk Reduction BehaviorSchool Health ServicesSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID23276777
PMCPMC3632253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.