Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23276303›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2012

A pilot study evaluating alternative approaches of academic detailing in rural family practice clinics.

Daniel M Hartung, Ann Hamer, Luke Middleton, Dean Haxby, Lyle J Fagnan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expanding Cessation Pharmacotherapy Via Videoconference Educational Outreach to Prescribers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. "You're on mute"-lessons learned with virtual academic detailing.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel M HartungOregon State University College of Pharmacy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. hartungd@ohsu.edu
Ann Hamer
Luke Middleton
Dean Haxby
Lyle J Fagnan
Oregon Health & Science University · USResearch Center for Rural Economy · CNResearch Network (United States) · US

Funding

Oregon Comparative Effectiveness Research K12 ProgramK12HS019456 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2010 to 2010
$2.1M
AHRQ HHS K12-HS019456-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcademic detailing is an interactive, convenient, and user-friendly approach to delivering non-commercial education to healthcare clinicians. While evidence suggests academic detailing is associated with improvements in prescribing behavior, uncertainty exists about generalizability and scalability in diverse settings. Our study evaluates different models of delivering academic detailing in a rural family medicine setting.

methodsWe conducted a pilot project to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and satisfaction with academic detailing delivered face-to-face as compared to a modified approach using distance-learning technology. The recipients were four family medicine clinics within the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN). Two clinics were allocated to receive face-to-face detailing and two received outreach through video conferencing or asynchronous web-based outreach. Surveys at midpoint and completion were used to assess effectiveness and satisfaction.

resultsEach clinic received four outreach visits over an eight month period. Topics included treatment-resistant depression, management of atypical antipsychotics, drugs for insomnia, and benzodiazepine tapering. Overall, 90% of participating clinicians were satisfied with the program. Respondents who received in person detailing reported a higher likelihood of changing their behavior compared to respondents in the distance detailing group for five of seven content areas. While 90%-100% of respondents indicated they would continue to participate if the program were continued, the likelihood of participation declined if only distance approaches were offered.

conclusionsWe found strong support and satisfaction for the program among participating clinicians. Participants favored in-person approaches to distance interactions. Future efforts will be directed at quantitative methods for evaluating the economic and clinical effectiveness of detailing in rural family practice settings.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesAttitude of Health PersonnelConsumer BehaviorEducation, DistanceEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeFeasibility StudiesFocus GroupsHumansInappropriate PrescribingOregonPilot ProjectsPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID23276303
PMCPMC3558441
OpenAlexW2107717966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.