Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23276302›Full record

ArticleGenome integrity2012

Resolution of complex ends by Nonhomologous end joining - better to be lucky than good?

Natasha Tiffany Strande, Crystal Ann Waters, Dale A Ramsden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome integrity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natasha Tiffany StrandeLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. dale_ramsden@med.unc.edu.
Crystal Ann Waters
Dale A Ramsden

Funding

NRSA IN GENETICST32GM007092 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SEKELSKY, JEFF J. · 1985 to 2019
$5.9M
Resolution of Complex Breaks by Nonhomologous End JoiningR01CA084442 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RAMSDEN, DALE A · 2000 to 2019
$4.8M
DNA Polymerases in Nonhomologous End JoiningU01CA097096 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RAMSDEN, DALE A · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084442NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097096NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Nonhomologous end joining pathway is essential for efficient repair of chromosome double strand breaks. This pathway consequently plays a key role in cellular resistance to break-inducing exogenous agents, as well as in the developmentally-programmed recombinations that are required for adaptive immunity. Chromosome breaks often have complex or "dirty" end structures that can interfere with the critical ligation step in this pathway; we review here how Nonhomologous end joining resolves such breaks.

Identifiers

PMID23276302
PMCPMC3547747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.