Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23276130›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental psychology2014

What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed?

Brent W Roberts, Carl Lejuez, Robert F Krueger, Jessica M Richards, Patrick L Hill

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 580 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Association Between Five Factor Model Personality Traits and Verbal and Numeric Reasoning.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. A century of research on conscientiousness at work.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brent W RobertsDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Carl LejuezDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland.
Robert F KruegerDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
Jessica M RichardsDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland.
Patrick L HillDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

NIA NIH HHS R01 2AG211178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conscientiousness is a personality construct that is a core determinant of health, positive aging, and human capital. A large body of work has contributed to our understanding of this important aspect of personality, but there are multiple conceptual and methodological issues that complicate our understanding of conscientiousness. Toward this end, we review (a) the conceptual standing of conscientiousness as a personality trait, (b) past research focusing on the underlying dimensions of conscientiousness, (c) the nomological network in which conscientiousness is embedded, and (d) the diverse methods that have been used to assess dimensions of conscientiousness. We conclude with recommendations for improving our understanding of the construct of conscientiousness, methods of assessment, and etiological underpinnings of conscientiousness. We believe this article can serve an important role in the larger goal of better understanding conscientiousness and its core role in the health of our society.

Indexed as

PersonalityPersonality AssessmentExecutive FunctionHumansImpulsive BehaviorModels, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID23276130
OpenAlexW2081148078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.