Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23276121›Full record

ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2013

Latent profile analysis to determine the typology of disinhibited eating behaviors in children and adolescents.

Anna Vannucci, Marian Tanofsky-Kraff, Ross D Crosby, Lisa M Ranzenhofer, Lauren B Shomaker, Sara E Field, Mira Mooreville, Samantha A Reina, Merel Kozlosky, Susan Z Yanovski and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pathways to eating in children and adolescents with obesity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna VannucciDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
Marian Tanofsky-Kraff
Ross D Crosby
Lisa M Ranzenhofer
Lauren B Shomaker
Sara E Field
Mira Mooreville
Samantha A Reina
Merel Kozlosky
Susan Z Yanovski
Jack A Yanovski
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

Physiology, Psychology, and Genetics of ObesityZIAHD000641 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI YANOVSKI, JACK A. · 2009 to 2025
$24.8M
Physiology, Psychology, and Genetics of ObesityZ01HD000641 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI YANOVSKI, JACK A. · 1996 to 2008
$4.6M
Preventing excessive weight gain in adolescent girls at high-risk for adult obesiR01DK080906 · NIDDK · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI TANOFSKY-KRAFF, MARIAN · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
A Laboratory Study of Adolescents' Eating in the Absence of HungerF32HD056762 · NICHD · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI SHOMAKER, LAUREN BERGER · 2008 to 2009
$96k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD000641Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD000641NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD056762NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe used latent profile analysis (LPA) to classify children and adolescents into subtypes based on the overlap of disinhibited eating behaviors-eating in the absence of hunger, emotional eating, and subjective and objective binge eating.

methodParticipants were 411 youths (8-18 years) from the community who reported on their disinhibited eating patterns. A subset (n = 223) ate ad libitum from two test meals.

resultsLPA produced five subtypes that were most prominently distinguished by objective binge eating (OBE; n = 53), subjective binge eating (SBE; n = 59), emotional eating (EE; n = 62), a mix of emotional eating and eating in the absence of hunger (EE-EAH; n = 172), and no disinhibited eating (No-DE; n = 64). Accounting for age, sex, race, and body mass index z score (BMI-z), the four disinhibited eating groups had more problem behaviors than the no disinhibited eating group (p = .001). OBE and SBE subtypes had greater BMI-z, percent fat mass, disordered eating attitudes, and trait anxiety than EE, EE-EAH, and No-DE subtypes (ps < .01). However, the OBE subtype reported the highest eating concern (p < .001), and the OBE, SBE, and EE subtypes reported higher depressive symptoms than the EE-EAH and No-DE subtypes. Across both test meals, OBE and SBE subtypes consumed a lesser percentage of protein and a higher percentage of carbohydrate than the other subtypes (ps < .02), adjusting for age, sex, race, height, lean mass, percent fat mass, and total intake. EE subtypes also consumed a greater percentage of carbohydrate and a lower percentage of fat than the EE-EAH and No-DE subtypes (ps < .03). The SBE subtype consumed the least total calories (p = .01). DISCUSSION: We conclude that behavioral subtypes of disinhibited eating may be distinguished by psychological characteristics and objective eating behavior. Prospective data are required to determine whether subtypes predict the onset of eating disorders and obesity.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentChildClinical Trials as TopicFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMaleModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID23276121
PMCPMC3615100
OpenAlexW2029275705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.