Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23275885›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2012

Genetic control of vulval development in Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Devika Sharanya, Bavithra Thillainathan, Sujatha Marri, Nagagireesh Bojanala, Jon Taylor, Stephane Flibotte, Donald G Moerman, Robert H Waterston, Bhagwati P Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterization of two newmicroPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Devika SharanyaDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
Bavithra Thillainathan
Sujatha Marri
Nagagireesh Bojanala
Jon Taylor
Stephane Flibotte
Donald G Moerman
Robert H Waterston
Bhagwati P Gupta
McMaster University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CACanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Global Identification of transcribed elements in the C. elegans genomeU01HG004263 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WATERSTON, ROBERT H · 2007 to 2011
$7.3M
Automated single-cell expression analysis in C. elegansR01GM072675 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WATERSTON, ROBERT H · 2005 to 2017
$7.1M
CIHRNHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004263NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae is an excellent model organism for the comparative analysis of gene function and developmental mechanisms. To study the evolutionary conservation and divergence of genetic pathways mediating vulva formation, we screened for mutations in C. briggsae that cause the egg-laying defective (Egl) phenotype. Here, we report the characterization of 13 genes, including three that are orthologs of Caenorhabditis elegans unc-84 (SUN domain), lin-39 (Dfd/Scr-related homeobox), and lin-11 (LIM homeobox). Based on the morphology and cell fate changes, the mutants were placed into four different categories. Class 1 animals have normal-looking vulva and vulva-uterine connections, indicating defects in other components of the egg-laying system. Class 2 animals frequently lack some or all of the vulval precursor cells (VPCs) due to defects in the migration of P-cell nuclei into the ventral hypodermal region. Class 3 animals show inappropriate fusion of VPCs to the hypodermal syncytium, leading to a reduced number of vulval progeny. Finally, class 4 animals exhibit abnormal vulval invagination and morphology. Interestingly, we did not find mutations that affect VPC induction and fates. Our work is the first study involving the characterization of genes in C. briggsae vulva formation, and it offers a basis for future investigations of these genes in C. elegans.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCaenorhabditisCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCell NucleusChromosome MappingDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenetic LinkageHomeodomain ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhenotypeCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsLin-11 protein, C eleganslin-39 protein, C elegansMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane ProteinsNuclear ProteinsTsp42Ej protein, DrosophilaUnc-84 protein, C elegansC. briggsaeC. eleganscell proliferationdevelopmentdifferentiationegg-laying defectivemorphogenesisvulva

Identifiers

PMID23275885
PMCPMC3516484
OpenAlexW2157825240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.