ArticleBioinformation2012
Identification of small molecule inhibitors against UBE2C by using docking studies.
Article in Bioinformation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of UBE2C in Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Overexpression of Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme E2C Is Associated with Worsened Prognosis in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Chromenopyrimidinone Controls Stemness and Malignancy by suppressing CD133 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2020Article
- UbcH10 a Major Actor in Cancerogenesis and a Potential Tool for Diagnosis and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- UBE2C Is a Potential Biomarker of Intestinal-Type Gastric Cancer With Chromosomal Instability.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2C is highly expressed in breast microcalcification lesions.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increased expression of UBE2C (Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C) has been associated with high tumor grade and cancer progression. It is an essential indicator of the mitotic destruction events. Our microarray study on cervical cancers showed UBE2C to be over expressed in cervical cancer. Subsequent studies from our laboratory, showed that inhibition of UBE2C can enhance radiation and chemosensitivity. Therefore it can be an appropriate target for drug development to identify potential and specific inhibitor of cancer. To identify small molecule inhibitors, a computational approach was used to model UBE2C and further docking studies were carried out. Different ligand subsets such as ChemBank, PDB, KEGG, Drug-likeness NCI, Not annotated NCI of ligand library ligands were downloaded and docked with UBE2C. Schrodinger tools were used for identifying active sites and docking studies of ligands with UBE2C. Based on glide score, the potential ligands were screened and its interaction with UBE2C was identified. We also analyzed the drug like properties such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADME/T) of docked compounds. Our results suggest that 2,4-diimino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazepan-6-one, sulfuric acid compound with 5,6-diamino-2,4-pyrimidinediol (1:1) and 7-alpha-d-ribofuranosyl-2-aminopurine-5'-phosphate may act as best inhibitors and further in vitro studies, may lead to development of novel and best inhibitor of UBE2C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.