ArticleNucleic acids research2013
Improved methods for creating migratable Holliday junction substrates.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The SMC Hinge is a Selective Gate for Obstacle Bypass.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- The dissolution of double Holliday junctions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014Review
- Many ways to loop DNA.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previously, we published a method for creating a novel DNA substrate, the double Holliday junction substrate. This substrate contains two Holliday junctions that are mobile, topologically constrained and separated by a distance comparable with conversion tract lengths. Although useful for studying late stage homologous recombination in vitro, construction of the substrate requires significant effort. In particular, there are three bottlenecks: (i) production of large quantities of single-stranded DNA; (ii) the loss of a significant portion of the DNA following the recombination step; and (iii) the loss of DNA owing to inefficient gel extraction. To address these limitations, we have made the following changes to the protocol: (i) use of a helper plasmid, rather than exogenous helper phage, to produce single-stranded DNA; (ii) use of the unidirectional C31 integrase system in place of the bidirectional Cre recombinase reaction; and (iii) gel extraction by DNA diffusion. Here, we describe the changes made to the materials and methods and characterize the substrates that can be produced, including migratable single Holliday junctions, hemicatenanes and a quadruple Holliday junction substrate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.