Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23274600›Full record

ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2013

Walking and running are associated with similar reductions in cataract risk.

Paul T Williams

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Association between Difficulty Seeing and Physical Activity among 17,777 Adults Residing in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genetics of human cataract.Clinical genetics · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul T WilliamsLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. ptwilliams@lbl.gov
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

Cross-sectional and prospective cohort data analysis of physical activity and heaR01HL094717 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI WILLIAMS, PAUL T · 2009 to 2011
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL094717NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHabitual running has been associated with reduced risk of cataract development in one prospective study. The purposes of the current analyses were to provide further evidence of this potentially important benefit of vigorous exercise and to test whether moderate exercise (e.g., walking) provides as significant and equivalent reduction in cataract risk as vigorous exercise (e.g., running).

methodsCox proportional hazard analyses of self-reported, physician-diagnosed incident cataracts versus baseline energy expenditure (METs) in 32,610 runners and 14,917 walkers during a 6.2-yr follow-up. Results are reported as hazard ratios (HR), percent risk reductions (100 (HR - 1)), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

resultsRunners and walkers reported 733 and 1074 incident cataracts during follow-up, respectively. When adjusted for sex, race, age, education, smoking, and intakes of meat, fruit, and alcohol, lower cataract risk was significantly associated with both running (HR = 0.960 per MET·h·d, 95% CI 0.935-0.986) and walking (HR = 0.918 per MET·h·d, 95% CI = 0.881-0.956), with no significant difference in the risk reduction per MET-hours per day between running and walking or between men and women. Compared with running or walking at or below guideline levels (≤1.8 MET·h·d), incident cataract risk was significantly lower for running or walking 1.8-3.6 (16.4% lower, 95% CI = 6.4%-25.3%), 3.6-5.4 (19.0% lower, 95% CI = 5.6%-30.4%), 5.4-7.2 (26.2% lower, 95% CI = 11.2%-38.7%), 7.2-9.0 (34.1% lower, 95% CI = 10.0%-51.2%), and ≥9 MET·h·d (41.6% lower, 95% CI = 19.8%-57.4%).

conclusionModerate (walking) and vigorous (running) exercise were both significantly associated with lower cataract risk and their effects similar. Cataract risk appears to decrease linearly with increasing exercise energy expenditure through 9 MET·h·d.

Indexed as

RunningWalkingAdultAgedCataractEnergy MetabolismFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth SurveysHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPhysical FitnessProportional Hazards ModelsRisk

Identifiers

PMID23274600
PMCPMC3757559
OpenAlexW1984561278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.