Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23274599›Full record

ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2013

Adaptations of mouse skeletal muscle to low-intensity vibration training.

James N McKeehen, Susan A Novotny, Kristen A Baltgalvis, Jarrod A Call, David J Nuckley, Dawn A Lowe

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CORP: In vivo muscle strength-perspectives on the design and interpretation of preclinical animal studies.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of volumetric muscle loss.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James N McKeehenRehabilitation Science and Program in Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Susan A Novotny
Kristen A Baltgalvis
Jarrod A Call
David J Nuckley
Dawn A Lowe
University of Minnesota · USAmerican Physical Therapy Association · USMinnesota Gastroenterology · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN MUSCLE RESEARCHT32AR007612 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI JAMES M ERVASTI, DAWN A LOWE · 2001 to 2026
$11.3M
Estrogenic Effects on Aged MuscleK02AG036827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LOWE, DAWN A · 2010 to 2013
$427k
NIAMS NIH HHS P30-AR0507220NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007612NIAMS NIH HHS T32-AR07612NIA NIH HHS K02 AG036827NIA NIH HHS K02-AG036827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe tested the hypothesis that low-intensity vibration training in mice improves contractile function of hindlimb skeletal muscles and promotes exercise-related cellular adaptations.

methodsWe subjected C57BL/6J mice to 6 wk, 5 d·wk, 15 min·d of sham or low-intensity vibration (45 Hz, 1.0g) while housed in traditional cages (Sham-Active, n = 8; Vibrated-Active, n = 10) or in small cages to restrict physical activity (Sham-Restricted, n = 8; Vibrated-Restricted, n = 8). Contractile function and resistance to fatigue were tested in vivo (anterior and posterior crural muscles) and ex vivo on the soleus muscle. Tibialis anterior and soleus muscles were evaluated histologically for alterations in oxidative metabolism, capillarity, and fiber types. Epididymal fat pad and hindlimb muscle masses were measured. Two-way ANOVAs were used to determine the effects of vibration and physical inactivity.

resultsVibration training resulted in a 10% increase in maximal isometric torque (P = 0.038) and 16% faster maximal rate of relaxation (P = 0.030) of the anterior crural muscles. Posterior crural muscles were unaffected by vibration, except greater rates of contraction in Vibrated-Restricted mice compared with Vibrated-Active and Sham-Restricted mice (P = 0.022). Soleus muscle maximal isometric tetanic force tended to be greater (P = 0.057), and maximal relaxation was 20% faster (P = 0.005) in vibrated compared with sham mice. The restriction of physical activity induced muscle weakness but was not required for vibration to be effective in improving strength or relaxation. Vibration training did not affect muscle fatigability or any indicator of cellular adaptation investigated (P ≥ 0.431). Fat pad but not hindlimb muscle masses were affected by vibration training.

conclusionVibration training in mice improved muscle contractility, specifically strength and relaxation rates, with no indication of adverse effects to muscle function or cellular adaptations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalVibrationAnimalsBiomarkersMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivityMuscle ContractionMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPhysical Conditioning, AnimalRandom AllocationBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23274599
PMCPMC3630262
OpenAlexW2085663529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.