Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23272658›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2012

Considerations when measuring myocardial perfusion reserve by cardiovascular magnetic resonance using regadenoson.

Nicole M Bhave, Benjamin H Freed, Chattanong Yodwut, Denise Kolanczyk, Karin Dill, Roberto M Lang, Victor Mor-Avi, Amit R Patel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00871260 (Stress Testing and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00871260 phase4completednot on this map

Stress Testing and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2009 to 2014Enrolled20ConditionsCoronary DiseaseArmsregadenoson
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance expert consensus statement on quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic response of regadenoson for stress perfusion CMR.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance adenosine stress-induced myocardial perfusion defect in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging identifies reduced flow reserve in microvascular coronary artery disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Article
  15. Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Update on Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole M BhaveDepartments of Medicine and Radiology, University of Chicago, Cardiac Imaging Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Benjamin H Freed
Chattanong Yodwut
Denise Kolanczyk
Karin Dill
Roberto M Lang
Victor Mor-Avi
Amit R Patel
University of Chicago · USImaging Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdenosine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can accurately quantify myocardial perfusion reserve. While regadenoson is increasingly employed due to ease of use, imaging protocols have not been standardized. We sought to determine the optimal regadenoson CMR protocol for quantifying myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRi) - more specifically, whether regadenoson stress imaging should be performed before or after rest imaging.

methodsTwenty healthy subjects underwent CMR perfusion imaging during resting conditions, during regadenoson-induced hyperemia (0.4 mg), and after 15 min of recovery. In 10/20 subjects, recovery was facilitated with aminophylline (125 mg). Myocardial time-intensity curves were used to obtain left ventricular cavity-normalized myocardial up-slopes. MPRi was calculated in two different ways: as the up-slope ratio of stress to rest (MPRi-rest), and the up-slope ratio of stress to recovery (MPRi-recov).

resultsIn all 20 subjects, MPRi-rest was 1.78 ± 0.60. Recovery up-slope did not return to resting levels, regardless of aminophylline use. Among patients not receiving aminophylline, MPRi-recov was 36 ± 16% lower than MPRi-rest (1.13 ± 0.38 vs. 1.82 ± 0.73, P = 0.001). In the 10 patients whose recovery was facilitated with aminophylline, MPRi-recov was 20 ± 24% lower than MPRi-rest (1.40 ± 0.35 vs. 1.73 ± 0.43, P = 0.04), indicating incomplete reversal. In 3 subjects not receiving aminophylline and 4 subjects receiving aminophylline, up-slope at recovery was greater than at stress, suggesting delayed maximal hyperemia.

conclusionsMPRi measurements from regadenoson CMR are underestimated if recovery perfusion is used as a substitute for resting perfusion, even when recovery is facilitated with aminophylline. True resting images should be used to allow accurate MPRi quantification. The delayed maximal hyperemia observed in some subjects deserves further study.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00871260.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CinePurinesPyrazolesVasodilator AgentsAdultAminophyllineBlood PressureChicagoContrast MediaFemaleHeart RateHumansHyperemiaMaleMiddle AgedAminophyllineContrast MediaPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsPurinesPyrazolesregadenosonVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID23272658
PMCPMC3552720
OpenAlexW2028240871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.