Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23272083›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Application of a high throughput method of biomarker discovery to improvement of the EarlyCDT(®)-Lung Test.

Isabel K Macdonald, Andrea Murray, Graham F Healey, Celine B Parsy-Kowalska, Jared Allen, Jane McElveen, Chris Robertson, Herbert F Sewell, Caroline J Chapman, John F R Robertson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Updates in Lung Cancer Screening: A Decade of Evidence.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biomarkers in Lung Cancer Screening: Achievements, Promises, and Challenges.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A panel of autoantibodies as potential early diagnostic serum biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lung Cancer Gene Signatures and Clinical Perspectives.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel K MacdonaldOncimmune Ltd, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Isabel.Macdonald@nottingham.ac.uk
Andrea Murray
Graham F Healey
Celine B Parsy-Kowalska
Jared Allen
Jane McElveen
Chris Robertson
Herbert F Sewell
Caroline J Chapman
John F R Robertson
Nottingham City Hospital · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Lung Screening Trial showed that CT screening for lung cancer led to a 20% reduction in mortality. However, CT screening has a number of disadvantages including low specificity. A validated autoantibody assay is available commercially (EarlyCDT®-Lung) to aid in the early detection of lung cancer and risk stratification in patients with pulmonary nodules detected by CT. Recent advances in high throughput (HTP) cloning and expression methods have been developed into a discovery pipeline to identify biomarkers that detect autoantibodies. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the successful clinical application of this strategy to add to the EarlyCDT-Lung panel in order to improve its sensitivity and specificity (and hence positive predictive value, (PPV)). METHODS AND

findingsSerum from two matched independent cohorts of lung cancer patients were used (n = 100 and n = 165). Sixty nine proteins were initially screened on an abridged HTP version of the autoantibody ELISA using protein prepared on small scale by a HTP expression and purification screen. Promising leads were produced in shake flask culture and tested on the full assay. These results were analyzed in combination with those from the EarlyCDT-Lung panel in order to provide a set of re-optimized cut-offs. Five proteins that still displayed cancer/normal differentiation were tested for reproducibility and validation on a second batch of protein and a separate patient cohort. Addition of these proteins resulted in an improvement in the sensitivity and specificity of the test from 38% and 86% to 49% and 93% respectively (PPV improvement from 1 in 16 to 1 in 7).

conclusionThis is a practical example of the value of investing resources to develop a HTP technology. Such technology may lead to improvement in the clinical utility of the EarlyCDT--Lung test, and so further aid the early detection of lung cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCloning, MolecularCohort StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPulmonary MedicineRespiratory Function TestsRiskBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23272083
PMCPMC3521770
OpenAlexW2096441539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.