Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23271772›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2012

Presenting treatment options to men with clinically localized prostate cancer: the acceptability of active surveillance/monitoring.

Jenny L Donovan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Psychological aspects of active surveillance.World journal of urology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer: a concept mapping approach.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Changing the Paradigm of Cancer Screening, Prevention, and Treatment.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jenny L DonovanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, UK. jenny.donovan@bristol.ac.uk
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presenting treatment options to men with localized prostate cancer is difficult because of the lack of definitive evidence and the range of treatment options available. Active surveillance and monitoring programs are now a recognized treatment option for men with low-risk localized prostate cancer, but many patients are not fully aware of the details of such programs, and most still opt for immediate radical (surgery or radiotherapy) treatment. The provision of high-quality information with decision aids has been shown to increase the acceptability of active surveillance/monitoring programs. This chapter outlines techniques for providing high-quality information about active surveillance/monitoring, based on the findings of a randomized controlled trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer. The ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) trial has randomized over 1500 men between active monitoring, radical surgery, and radical radiotherapy by ensuring that information was tailored to men's existing knowledge and views. Care was taken with the content, order, and enthusiasm of the presentation of treatments by recruitment staff, and clinicians and other health professionals were supported to feel comfortable with being open about the uncertainties in the evidence and helped to rephrase terminology likely to be misinterpreted by patients. These techniques of information provision should be added to the use of decision aids to enable patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer in routine practice to reach well-informed and reasoned decisions about their treatment, including full consideration of active surveillance and monitoring programs.

Indexed as

Decision MakingProstatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingDecision Support TechniquesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID23271772
PMCPMC3540874
OpenAlexW2127443840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.