ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2013
Probing neuronal activities with genetically encoded optical indicators: from a historical to a forward-looking perspective.
Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac optogenetics: a decade of enlightenment.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Optogenetic Monitoring of Synaptic Activity with Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2016Review
- Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators in Circulation Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Comparative performance of a genetically-encoded voltage indicator and a blue voltage sensitive dye for large scale cortical voltage imaging.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Article
- Cardiac applications of optogenetics.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2014Review
- Toward microendoscopy-inspired cardiac optogenetics in vivo: technical overview and perspective.Journal of biomedical optics · 2014Review
- Molecular neuroanatomy: a generation of progress.Trends in neurosciences · 2014Review
- Exploration of genetically encoded voltage indicators based on a chimeric voltage sensing domain.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2014Article
- Genetically encoded voltage sensor goes live.Nature biotechnology · 2013Article
- Membrane "potential-omics": toward voltage imaging at the cell population level in roots of living plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical imaging has a long history in physiology and in neurophysiology in particular. Over the past 15 years or so, new methodologies have emerged that combine genetic engineering with light-based imaging methods. This merger has resulted in a tool box of genetically encoded optical indicators that enable nondestructive and long-lasting monitoring of neuronal activities at the cellular, circuit, and system level. This review describes the historical roots and fundamental concepts underlying these new approaches, evaluates current progress in this field, and concludes with a forward-looking perspective on current work and potential future developments in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23271451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.