Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23271376›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2013

Secondary structural analysis of proteins based on (13)C chemical shift assignments in unresolved solid-state NMR spectra enhanced by fragmented structure database.

Keisuke Ikeda, Ayako Egawa, Toshimichi Fujiwara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keisuke IkedaInstitute for Protein Research, Osaka University, 3-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Ayako Egawa
Toshimichi Fujiwara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magic-angle-spinning solid-state (13)C NMR spectroscopy is useful for structural analysis of non-crystalline proteins. However, the signal assignments and structural analysis are often hampered by the signal overlaps primarily due to minor structural heterogeneities, especially for uniformly-(13)C,(15)N labeled samples. To overcome this problem, we present a method for assigning (13)C chemical shifts and secondary structures from unresolved two-dimensional (13)C-(13)C MAS NMR spectra by spectral fitting, named reconstruction of spectra using protein local structures (RESPLS). The spectral fitting was conducted using databases of protein fragmented structures related to (13)C(α), (13)C(β), and (13)C' chemical shifts and cross-peak intensities. The experimental (13)C-(13)C inter- and intra-residue correlation spectra of uniformly isotope-labeled ubiquitin in the lyophilized state had a few broad peaks. The fitting analysis for these spectra provided sequence-specific C(α), C(β), and C' chemical shifts with an accuracy of about 1.5 ppm, which enabled the assignment of the secondary structures with an accuracy of 79 %. The structural heterogeneity of the lyophilized ubiquitin is revealed from the results. Test of RESPLS analysis for simulated spectra of five different types of proteins indicated that the method allowed the secondary structure determination with accuracy of about 80 % for the 50-200 residue proteins. These results demonstrate that the RESPLS approach expands the applicability of the NMR to non-crystalline proteins exhibiting unresolved (13)C NMR spectra, such as lyophilized proteins, amyloids, membrane proteins and proteins in living cells.

Indexed as

Carbon IsotopesFreeze DryingMonte Carlo MethodNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryUbiquitinCarbon IsotopesProteinsUbiquitin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.