ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2013
Reduced side effects by proton microchannel radiotherapy: study in a human skin model.
Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Roadmap for the implementation of particle minibeam therapy.Medical physics · 2026Review
- Photon minibeam-based LATTICE radiotherapy for small and medium-sized tumors: A dosimetric planning study.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Cell survival comparison of proton, helium, and carbon ion interlaced minibeams in water phantom simulations.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Mini-GRID enhances survival and reduces toxicity in an orthotopic murine model of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A proof-of-concept study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Photon mini-GRID therapy for preoperative breast cancer tumor treatment: A treatment plan study.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Are we overestimating proton minibeam therapy effectiveness through physical dose metrics?Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Proton minibeam radiotherapy: a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Challenges for the Implementation of Primary Standard Dosimetry in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy.Cancers · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- TVL1-IMPT: Optimization of Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratio Via Joint Total-Variation and L1 Dose Regularization for Spatially Fractionated Pencil-Beam-Scanning Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023Article
- Longitudinally Heterogeneous Tumor Dose Optimizes Proton Broadbeam, Interlaced Minibeam, and FLASH Therapy.Cancers · 2022Article
- Preclinical dosimetry in proton minibeam radiation therapy: Robustness analysis and guidelines.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Article
- Radiobiological and Treatment-Related Aspects of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Planar Proton Minibeam Irradiation Elicits Spatially Confined DNA Damage in a Human Epidermis Model.Cancers · 2022Article
- Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy and Arc Therapy: Proof of Concept of a Winning Alliance.Cancers · 2021Article
- Article
- First Evaluation of Temporal and Spatial Fractionation in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy of Glioma-Bearing Rats.Cancers · 2021Article
- Conceptual Design of a Novel Nozzle Combined with a Clinical Proton Linac for Magnetically Focussed Minibeams.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of a microchannel proton irradiation was compared to homogeneous irradiation in a three-dimensional human skin model. The goal is to minimize the risk of normal tissue damage by microchannel irradiation, while preserving local tumor control through a homogeneous irradiation of the tumor that is achieved because of beam widening with increasing track length. 20 MeV protons were administered to the skin models in 10- or 50-μm-wide irradiation channels on a quadratic raster with distances of 500 μm between each channel (center to center) applying an average dose of 2 Gy. For comparison, other samples were irradiated homogeneously at the same average dose. Normal tissue viability was significantly enhanced after microchannel proton irradiation compared to homogeneous irradiation. Levels of inflammatory parameters, such as Interleukin-6, TGF-Beta, and Pro-MMP1, were significantly lower in the supernatant of the human skin tissue after microchannel irradiation than after homogeneous irradiation. The genetic damage as determined by the measurement of micronuclei in keratinocytes also differed significantly. This difference was quantified via dose modification factors (DMF) describing the effect of each irradiation mode relative to homogeneous X-ray irradiation, so that the DMF of 1.21 ± 0.20 after homogeneous proton irradiation was reduced to 0.23 ± 0.11 and 0.40 ± 0.12 after microchannel irradiation using 10- and 50-μm-wide channels, respectively. Our data indicate that proton microchannel irradiation maintains cell viability while significantly reducing inflammatory responses and genetic damage compared to homogeneous irradiation, and thus might improve protection of normal tissue after irradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.