Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23270813›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2013

Microscale thermophoresis quantifies biomolecular interactions under previously challenging conditions.

Susanne A I Seidel, Patricia M Dijkman, Wendy A Lea, Geert van den Bogaart, Moran Jerabek-Willemsen, Ana Lazic, Jeremiah S Joseph, Prakash Srinivasan, Philipp Baaske, Anton Simeonov and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 316 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
316citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

316 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel KRAS-G12D inhibitors.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A broad-spectrum inhibitor of copper-exporting PProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

256 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Susanne A I SeidelSystems Biophysics and Functional Nanosystems, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Amalienstrasse 54, 80799 Munich, Germany.
Patricia M Dijkman
Wendy A Lea
Geert van den Bogaart
Moran Jerabek-Willemsen
Ana Lazic
Jeremiah S Joseph
Prakash Srinivasan
Philipp Baaske
Anton Simeonov
Ilia Katritch
Fernando A Melo
John E Ladbury
Gideon Schreiber
Anthony Watts
Dieter Braun
Stefan Duhr

Funding

JCSG Center:Innovative Membrane Protein Technology (RMI)P50GM073197 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI STEVENS, RAYMOND C · 2004 to 2013
$26.8M
Intramural NIH HHSMedical Research Council G0900076Medical Research Council G1000909NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM073197NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM073197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscale thermophoresis (MST) allows for quantitative analysis of protein interactions in free solution and with low sample consumption. The technique is based on thermophoresis, the directed motion of molecules in temperature gradients. Thermophoresis is highly sensitive to all types of binding-induced changes of molecular properties, be it in size, charge, hydration shell or conformation. In an all-optical approach, an infrared laser is used for local heating, and molecule mobility in the temperature gradient is analyzed via fluorescence. In standard MST one binding partner is fluorescently labeled. However, MST can also be performed label-free by exploiting intrinsic protein UV-fluorescence. Despite the high molecular weight ratio, the interaction of small molecules and peptides with proteins is readily accessible by MST. Furthermore, MST assays are highly adaptable to fit to the diverse requirements of different biomolecules, such as membrane proteins to be stabilized in solution. The type of buffer and additives can be chosen freely. Measuring is even possible in complex bioliquids like cell lysate allowing close to in vivo conditions without sample purification. Binding modes that are quantifiable via MST include dimerization, cooperativity and competition. Thus, its flexibility in assay design qualifies MST for analysis of biomolecular interactions in complex experimental settings, which we herein demonstrate by addressing typically challenging types of binding events from various fields of life science.

Indexed as

Animalsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesBinding, CompetitiveDimerizationGRB2 Adaptor ProteinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesLasersMolecular ConformationProtein BindingProteinsProtozoan ProteinsRatsReceptor, Adenosine A2AReceptors, Neurotensinbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesGRB2 Adaptor ProteinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone Methyltransferasesneurotensin type 1 receptorProteinsProtozoan ProteinsReceptor, Adenosine A2AReceptors, Neurotensin

Identifiers

PMID23270813
PMCPMC3644557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.