Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23269826›Full record

ArticlemBio2012

Entry and killing of Tetrahymena thermophila by bacterially produced Shiga toxin.

Gino Stolfa, Gerald B Koudelka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pathogenomes of Atypical Non-shigatoxigenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gino StolfaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Gerald B Koudelka
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPhage-encoded Shiga toxin (Stx) acts as a bacterial defense against the eukaryotic predator Tetrahymena thermophila. It is unknown how Stx enters Tetrahymena protozoa or how it kills them. Tetrahymena protozoa are phagocytotic; hence, Stx could gain entry to the cytoplasm through the oral apparatus or via endocytosis. We find that Stx2 can kill T. thermophila protozoa that lack an oral apparatus, indicating that Stx2 can enter these cells via endocytosis. As opposed to the lack of effect on mammalian phagocytes, Stx2 produced by bacteria encapsulated within phagocytotic vesicles is also capable of killing Tetrahymena. Addition of an excess of the carbohydrate binding subunits of Stx2 (StxB) and/or ricin (ricin B) blocks Stx2 cytotoxicity. Thus, regardless of whether Stx2 enters the cytoplasm by endocytosis or from the phagocytotic vesicle, this transport is mediated by a putative glycoconjugate receptor. Bacteriophage-mediated lysis of Stx-encoding bacteria is necessary for Stx toxicity in Tetrahymena; i.e., toxin released as a consequence of digestion of bacteria by Tetrahymena is harmless to the cell. This finding provides a rationale as to why the genes encoding Stx are found almost exclusively on bacteriophages; Stx must be released from the bacteria prior to the digestion of the cell, or it will not be able to exert its cytotoxic effect. It also suggests a reason why other bacterial exotoxins are also found only on temperate bacteriophages. Incubation of Tetrahymena with purified Stx2 decreases total protein synthesis. This finding indicates that, similar to mammalian cells, Stx2 kills Tetrahymena by inactivating its ribosomes. IMPORTANCE: Tetrahymena is a bacterial predator and a model for mammalian phagocytosis and intracellular vesicular trafficking. Phage-encoded exotoxins apparently have evolved for the purpose of bacterial antipredator defense. These exotoxins kill mammalian cells by inactivating universally conserved factors and/or pathways. Tetrahymena and susceptible mammalian cells are killed when exposed to bacteriophage-encoded Shiga toxin (Stx). Stx toxicity in mammalian cells requires Stx binding to the globotriaosyl ceramide (Gb3) receptor, followed by receptor-mediated endocytosis (RME). We show that, similar to mammalian cells, internalized Stx inhibits protein synthesis in Tetrahymena. Although Tetrahymena lacks Gb3, our results suggest that the cytotoxic effect of Stx on Tetrahymena is apparently mediated by a receptor, thereby arguing for the existence of RME in Tetrahymena. As opposed to the case with mammalian phagocytes, Stx produced by bacteria inside Tetrahymena is cytotoxic, suggesting that these cells may represent a "missing link" between unicellular eukaryotic bacterial predators and phagocytotic mammalian cells.

Indexed as

EndocytosisBacteriolysisBacteriophagesCell SurvivalProtein BiosynthesisRibosomesShiga Toxin 2Tetrahymena thermophilaShiga Toxin 2

Identifiers

PMID23269826
PMCPMC3531803
OpenAlexW2148976479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.