Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23269814›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2013

Pretreatment dietary patterns, weight status, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma prognosis.

Anna E Arthur, Karen E Peterson, Laura S Rozek, Jeremy M G Taylor, Emily Light, Douglas B Chepeha, James R Hébert, Jeffrey E Terrell, Gregory T Wolf, Sonia A Duffy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna E ArthurDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0482, USA.
Karen E Peterson
Laura S Rozek
Jeremy M G Taylor
Emily Light
Douglas B Chepeha
James R Hébert
Jeffrey E Terrell
Gregory T Wolf
Sonia A Duffy
UM Head and Neck SPORE Program

Funding

Therapeutic Potential and Mechanism of Action of Potent Small Molecule InhibitorsP50CA097248 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOLF, GREGORY T · 2002 to 2013
$25.3M
Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Expanding Mentoring Capacity in High-Risk PopulationsK05CA136975 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2009 to 2013
$801k
NCI NIH HHS CA097248NCI NIH HHS K05 CA136975NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097248NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have evaluated the association of diet and weight status with head and neck cancer outcomes.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether pretreatment dietary patterns and weight status are associated with head and neck cancer prognosis.

designThis was a longitudinal study of 542 patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer who completed food-frequency questionnaires and health surveys before treatment. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records and the Social Security Death Index. Dietary patterns were identified by using principal component analysis. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of derived dietary patterns (fit by quintiles of exposure) and weight status with time to recurrence and survival, with control for covariates.

resultsDuring the study period, there were 229 deaths and 184 recurrences. Two dietary patterns were identified: a whole-foods pattern (characterized by high intakes of vegetables, fruit, fish, poultry, and whole grains) and a Western pattern (characterized by high intakes of red and processed meats, refined grains, potatoes, and French fries). In multivariable analyses, significantly fewer deaths were observed in subjects most adherent to the whole-foods pattern (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.92; P-trend = 0.01). Subjects classified as overweight or obese had significantly fewer deaths (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.85; P = 0.001) and recurrences (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.95; P = 0.02) than did normal-weight or underweight subjects.

conclusionConsumption of a diet rich in vegetables, fruit, fish, poultry, and whole grains and being overweight before diagnosis with head and neck cancer are associated with a better prognosis.

Indexed as

DietAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFunctional FoodHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMichiganMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalObesity

Identifiers

PMID23269814
PMCPMC3545683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.