Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23269732›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Utility of PCR in diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: real-life data from a multicenter study.

Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Wolfgang Mutschlechner, Maria Aigner, Katharina Grif, Claudia Marth, Michael Girschikofsky, Wilhelm Grander, Richard Greil, Gudrun Russ, Peter Cerkl and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnosis from Tissue: Histology and Identification.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Cornelia Lass-FlörlDivision of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. cornelia.lass-floerl@i-med.ac.at
Wolfgang Mutschlechner
Maria Aigner
Katharina Grif
Claudia Marth
Michael Girschikofsky
Wilhelm Grander
Richard Greil
Gudrun Russ
Peter Cerkl
Mirjam Eller
Gabriele Kropshofer
Stephan Eschertzhuber
Hermann Kathrein
Stefan Schmid
Ronny Beer
Ingo Lorenz
Igor Theurl
David Nachbaur
Innsbruck Medical University · ATUniversity Hospital Innsbruck · ATUnfallkrankenhaus Salzburg · ATUniversität Innsbruck · ATHanusch Hospital · ATKrankenhaus der Elisabethinen · ATTirol Kliniken · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective studies addressing the clinical value of broad-range PCR using the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) for diagnosis of microscopy-negative fungal infections in nonselected patient populations are lacking. We first assessed the diagnostic performance of ITS rRNA gene PCR compared with that of routine microscopic immunofluorescence examination. Second, we addressed prospectively the impact and clinical value of broad-range PCR for the diagnosis of infections using samples that tested negative by routine microscopy; the corresponding patients' data were evaluated by detailed medical record reviews. Results from 371 specimens showed a high concordance of >80% for broad-range PCR and routine conventional methods, indicating that the diagnostic performance of PCR for fungal infections is comparable to that of microscopy, which is currently considered part of the "gold standard." In this prospective study, 206 specimens with a negative result on routine microscopy were analyzed with PCR, and patients' clinical data were reviewed according to the criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. We found that broad-range PCR showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 57.1%, 97.0%, 80%, and 91.7%, respectively, for microscopy-negative fungal infections. This study defines a possible helpful role of broad-range PCR for diagnosis of microscopy-negative fungal infections in conjunction with other tests.

Indexed as

DNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFungiHumansMicrobiological TechniquesMycologyMycosesPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID23269732
PMCPMC3592065
OpenAlexW2035530785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.