ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2013
Molecular genetic testing for mitochondrial disease: from one generation to the next.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in diagnosis of mitochondrial dysfunction and primary mitochondrial disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial disease management through phytochemical interventions.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Review
- Mitochondrial diseases: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Experiences from dual genome next-generation sequencing panel testing for mitochondrial disorders: a comprehensive molecular diagnosis.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- A Review over Mitochondrial Diseases Due to mtDNA Mutations: Recent Advances and Remedial Aspects.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Review
- Emerging Multi-omic Approaches to the Molecular Diagnosis of Mitochondrial Disease and Available Strategies for Treatment and Prevention.Current genomics · 2024Review
- Mitochondrial diseases in Hong Kong: prevalence, clinical characteristics and genetic landscape.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial DNA variants in a cohort from Argentina with suspected Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON).PloS one · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Recent advances in mitochondrial diseases: From molecular insights to therapeutic perspectives.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022Review
- Time to harmonize mitochondrial syndrome nomenclature and classification: A consensus from the North American Mitochondrial Disease Consortium (NAMDC).Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2022Review
- Use of Next-Generation Sequencing for Identifying Mitochondrial Disorders.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
- Biallelic Variants inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Mitochondrial hepatopathy: Respiratory chain disorders- 'breathing in and out of the liver'.World journal of hepatology · 2021Review
- Association Study Between Genetic Variation in Whole Mitochondrial Genome and Ischemic Stroke.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2021Article
- Pilot Screening of Cell-Free mtDNA in NIPT: Quality Control, Variant Calling, and Haplogroup Determination.Genes · 2021Article
- Comparative Analysis of Experimental Methods to Quantify Animal Activity in Caenorhabditis elegans Models of Mitochondrial Disease.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021Article
- Specifications of the ACMG/AMP standards and guidelines for mitochondrial DNA variant interpretation.Human mutation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular genetic diagnostic testing for mitochondrial disease has evolved continually since the first genetic basis for a clinical mitochondrial disease syndrome was identified in the late 1980s. Owing to global limitations in both knowledge and technology, few individuals, even among those with strong clinical or biochemical evidence of mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction, ever received a definitive molecular diagnosis prior to 2005. Clinically available genetic diagnostic testing options improved by 2006 to include sequencing and deletion analysis of an increasing number of individual nuclear genes linked to mitochondrial disease, genome-wide microarray analysis for chromosomal copy number abnormalities, and mitochondrial DNA whole genome sequence analysis. To assess the collective effect of these tests on the genetic diagnosis of suspected mitochondrial disease, we report here results from a retrospective review of the diagnostic yield in patients evaluated from 2008 to 2011 in the Mitochondrial-Genetics Diagnostic Clinic at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Among 152 patients aged 6 weeks to 81 years referred for clinical evaluation of multisystem presentations concerning for suspected mitochondrial disease, a genetic etiology was established that confirmed definite mitochondrial disease in 16.4% and excluded primary mitochondrial disease in 9.2%. Substantial diagnostic challenges remain owing to the clinical difficulty and frank low yield of a priori selecting individual nuclear genes to sequence based on particular symptomatic or biochemical manifestations of suspected mitochondrial disease. These findings highlight the particular utility of massively parallel nuclear exome sequencing technologies, whose benefits and limitations are explored relative to the clinical genetic diagnostic evaluation of mitochondrial disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.