An indirect approach to generating specific human cell types.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Production of human entorhinal stellate cell-like cells by forward programming shows an important role of Foxp1 in reprogramming.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
   Article
2. Engineering Biomaterials with Micro/Nanotechnologies for Cell Reprogramming.ACS nano · 2020
   Review
3. Insights Into the Role and Potential of Schwann Cells for Peripheral Nerve Repair From Studies of Development and Injury.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
   Article
4. New approaches for direct conversion of patient fibroblasts into neural cells.Brain research · 2017
   Review
5. Inhibition of JAK-STAT ERK/MAPK and Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Induces a Change in Gene Expression Profile of Bovine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Conversion of human fibroblasts to angioblast-like progenitor cells.2013
• Comment on
  Generation of integration-free neural progenitor cells from cells in human urine.2013

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as