Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23269361›Full record

ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2013

Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue.

Ellen Cristina Gartti-Jardim, Ariane Paredes de Souza, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes de Souza Carvalho, Cassiano Costa Silva Pereira, Roberta Okamoto, Osvaldo Magro Filho

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02863874 (Comparison of VicrylPlus® Versus Vicryl® for Surgical Repair of Perineal Tears; a Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02863874 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of VicrylPlus® Versus Vicryl® for Surgical Repair of Perineal Tears; a Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,890ConditionsSkin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections, Wound InfectionArmsVicrylPlus®, Vicryl®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ellen Cristina Gartti-JardimDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Propedeutics, School of Dentistry of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University- UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil, ellengaetti@gmail.com.
Ariane Paredes de Souza
Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes de Souza Carvalho
Cassiano Costa Silva Pereira
Roberta Okamoto
Osvaldo Magro Filho

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVarious types of sutures are available in the market with different constitutions. However, there is a lack of research to assess and quantify the behavior of these materials. RESOURCES AND MATERIALS: This study comes benchmark wires polyglactin 910 (Vicryl®), irradiated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapid®), polyglactin 910 treated with triclosan (Vicryl Plus®), and poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl®). For this, we used 40 rats that were divided into two groups, underwent two skin incisions longitudinal 2-cm long. In Group A, simple interrupted sutures using irradiated polyglactin 910 on the right and left side of polyglactin 910, and in group B, polyglactin 910 with triclosan on the right and the left poliglecaprone 25 were made. At 2, 7, 14, and 28 days after surgery, the ten animals were killed per period, and the samples were processed for histomorphologic and histometric analysis.

conclusionsThe results demonstrated that the wire poliglecaprone 25 showed better biological response, with less inflammatory infiltrates and rapid organization of connective tissue.

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatibleDioxanesPolyestersSuturesTriclosanAnimalsDermisMalePolyglactin 910RatsWound HealingCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDioxanesglycolide E-caprolactone copolymerPolyestersPolyglactin 910Triclosan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.